Yazılar

Right-Wing Media Figures and AI Pioneers Unite to Call for Superintelligent AI Ban

A coalition of U.S. right-wing media figures and AI pioneers has issued a joint statement urging a global ban on developing superintelligent artificial intelligence, warning that progress toward machines exceeding human cognition must halt until society can ensure safety and democratic oversight.

The initiative, announced Wednesday by the Future of Life Institute (FLI), includes signatures from Steve Bannon, Glenn Beck, and tech luminaries Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio—two of the so-called “godfathers of AI.” The non-profit, founded in 2014 and initially supported by Elon Musk and tech investor Jaan Tallinn, has long advocated for responsible AI development and limits on advanced machine intelligence.

The statement calls for governments worldwide to prohibit the creation of AI systems capable of surpassing human intelligence until “science shows a safe way forward” and “the public demands it.” It argues that current AI development races are reckless and could produce technologies that threaten human autonomy, stability, and safety.

The unusual alliance between conservative media figures and leading scientists highlights the broadening political and cultural anxiety surrounding AI’s rapid evolution. It also reflects growing skepticism on the populist right, where some commentators have warned that unchecked AI could concentrate power in corporate and political elites.

While many in the technology industry and the U.S. government have dismissed calls for AI moratoriums as harmful to innovation and economic competitiveness, the involvement of influential figures like Bannon, Beck, and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak could amplify public debate. Other signatories include former Irish President Mary Robinson and Virgin Group founder Richard Branson.

Supporters of the ban say the move is not anti-technology but a precautionary measure. “The race to build superintelligent AI must not outpace our ability to control it,” said an FLI spokesperson. “Without democratic input and safety guarantees, the risks are existential.”

The statement follows a broader series of warnings from experts and public figures, including Musk and OpenAI co-founder Sam Altman, who have both urged the creation of global AI safety frameworks.

Musk’s new Tesla pay deal could earn billions even without “Mars-shot” breakthroughs

Elon Musk’s record-breaking $878 billion Tesla pay package, pitched as contingent on “Mars-shot” achievements, could still grant him tens of billions of dollars even if he misses the most ambitious goals, according to a Reuters analysis of the deal’s structure and expert evaluations.

When Tesla’s board approved the 10-year compensation plan in September, it told investors Musk would only earn shares by transforming Tesla and society through advances in AI, robotics, and autonomy. Yet performance experts say the plan’s vague definitions and lenient milestones could see Musk earning massive payouts without revolutionizing the company.

By achieving only a handful of easier targets—such as modest vehicle sales and incremental growth in Full Self-Driving (FSD) subscriptions—Musk could collect more than $50 billion in Tesla stock. Even two minor achievements, paired with a $2.5 trillion valuation, would grant him $26 billion, more than the lifetime pay of several top U.S. CEOs combined.

Critics argue that goals like selling 1.2 million cars annually or reaching 10 million FSD subscriptions are achievable without breakthroughs in autonomy or robotics. Experts also noted that definitions of “advanced driving system” and “robot” are so broad that Musk could qualify for payouts without delivering true self-driving or humanoid robots.

Tesla’s board insists the package is “worth zero unless value doubles,” yet corporate governance analysts warn that the structure grants Musk huge rewards with minimal accountability. The hardest targets—profit milestones up to $400 billion—may be out of reach, but Tesla’s market value could still reach $2–3 trillion over a decade with average stock growth.

Morningstar analyst Seth Goldstein said the company’s valuation already hinges on “future products that don’t exist today.” Whether Musk delivers them—or merely the promise—will decide if shareholders’ faith pays off.