Yazılar

Arm to Appeal Court Ruling Upholding Qualcomm’s Victory in Licensing Dispute

Arm announced on Tuesday that it will appeal a U.S. federal court decision that upheld Qualcomm’s jury victory in a long-running dispute over processor licensing rights, marking the latest escalation in a case with major implications for the semiconductor industry.

The dispute centers on central processor units (CPUs) designed by Qualcomm’s subsidiary Nuvia, which Arm claimed were produced using its technology without proper authorization. In 2023, a Delaware federal jury ruled that Qualcomm’s CPUs were properly licensed under an existing agreement with Arm, handing a key win to the U.S. chipmaker.

The jury sided with Qualcomm on two of three counts, while deadlocking on the third, leading Judge Maryellen Noreika to declare a mistrial on that issue. Arm later sought to have the favorable verdicts for Qualcomm overturned or to secure a new trial, but the judge rejected both requests.

“Arm remains confident in its position in its ongoing dispute with Qualcomm and will immediately file an appeal seeking to overturn the judgment,” the British chip designer said in a statement.

Qualcomm welcomed the decision, framing it as a validation of its innovation rights.

“Our right to innovate prevailed in this case, and we hope Arm will return to fair and competitive practices in dealing with the Arm ecosystem,” said Ann Chaplin, Qualcomm’s general counsel.

The ruling underscores tensions between Arm’s new licensing model and major semiconductor firms that depend on its architecture. Arm provides fundamental chip technology used in processors made by Qualcomm, Apple, and MediaTek, which power billions of smartphones and connected devices worldwide.

The appeal sets the stage for a closely watched legal battle that could influence how chipmakers access and use Arm’s core intellectual property in future CPU designs.

Beijing E-Town Sues Applied Materials Over Alleged Trade Secret Theft

Beijing E-Town Semiconductor Technologies, a government-backed Chinese semiconductor equipment company, has filed a lawsuit against U.S. chip equipment supplier Applied Materials, accusing it of illegally obtaining and using trade secrets related to plasma sources and wafer surface treatment. The company seeks 99.99 million yuan ($13.94 million) in damages.

According to Beijing E-Town, Applied Materials disclosed technical secrets by applying for a patent in China and claiming the patent’s application rights. Applied Materials has not responded to requests for comment.

The dispute traces back to 2016 when Beijing E-Town acquired California-based semiconductor equipment designer Mattson Technology. Applied Materials previously sued Mattson in 2022, alleging it had hired former Applied Materials employees to steal trade secrets. Mattson countered with similar accusations in 2023.

In the new lawsuit filed at the Beijing Intellectual Property Court, Beijing E-Town claims that Applied Materials employed two former Mattson employees who later became principal inventors on a patent filed in China. This patent allegedly disclosed confidential technology jointly held by Beijing E-Town and Mattson. Beijing E-Town asserts that Applied Materials’ actions violated China’s fair competition law and constituted trade secret infringement.

The Beijing court has accepted the case, but no hearing has been scheduled yet.

Texas Company Sues Apple Over Alleged Theft of Technology Behind Apple Pay

Apple (AAPL.O) faces a lawsuit from Texas-based firm Fintiv, accusing the tech giant of stealing trade secrets and technology developed by CorFire, a company Fintiv acquired in 2014, to create Apple Pay. The complaint, filed in Atlanta federal court, alleges that Apple held multiple meetings and nondisclosure agreements with CorFire in 2011 and 2012 intending to license its mobile wallet technology but instead used the information and persuaded CorFire employees to join Apple.

Fintiv claims Apple used this technology to launch Apple Pay in 2014 and profited by generating fees for major credit card issuers and payment networks without compensating Fintiv. The lawsuit accuses Apple of corporate theft and racketeering under federal and Georgia trade secrets and RICO laws, seeking both compensatory and punitive damages.

Apple has not commented on the lawsuit. A related patent infringement case by Fintiv against Apple was dismissed earlier this month in Austin, Texas, with Fintiv planning to appeal.