Yazılar

Senators Urge Trump to Support Congressional Plan for TikTok Sale Deadline Extension

Three Democratic senators have called on President Donald Trump to seek congressional approval for extending the deadline for ByteDance, the Chinese parent company of TikTok, to sell a majority stake in the app to U.S. owners. This call comes amid ongoing concerns over a potential ban of TikTok in the United States.

Earlier this year, Trump unilaterally extended the original deadline from January 19 to April 5 by postponing the enforcement of a law requiring ByteDance to divest a majority stake to U.S. investors. Trump suggested that he may further extend this deadline to provide additional time to finalize a deal.

Senators Ed Markey, Chris Van Hollen, and Cory Booker expressed concerns about the legality and the long-term future of TikTok under the current non-enforcement stance, stating that the deadline extension should be handled through legislation passed by Congress. They urged Trump to back a proposal that would extend the deadline until October. The senators emphasized the need for a legislative solution, pointing out that TikTok is used by 170 million Americans and should not be left in limbo.

In response, the White House has yet to comment, but discussions have reportedly been focusing on a plan that would involve the largest non-Chinese investors in ByteDance increasing their stakes to take over the U.S. operations of TikTok. This move aims to dilute Chinese ownership, thereby addressing national security concerns regarding the app’s potential use in influence operations.

The fate of TikTok has been uncertain for months, with some reports suggesting that the Trump administration is working on a deal involving Oracle and other investors to take control of TikTok’s U.S. operations. The senators have called for clarity from Trump regarding the legal basis for any further extensions and whether the White House is in negotiations with Oracle to manage TikTok’s user data security.

Britain to Make Sexually Explicit Deepfakes a Crime

The British government announced on Tuesday that creating and sharing sexually explicit “deepfakes” will soon become a criminal offence in an effort to combat the growing problem of digitally manipulated images, often targeting women and girls. Deepfakes are AI-generated images, videos, or audio clips that convincingly alter a person’s likeness, commonly used to create pornographic content without consent.

While the UK has criminalized the publication of intimate images without consent under the “revenge porn” law since 2015, the new legislation specifically addresses the use of fake images, which were previously not covered. Data from the UK-based Revenge Porn Helpline revealed a staggering 400% increase in image-based abuse involving deepfakes since 2017.

The new law will make it a criminal offence to both create and distribute sexually explicit deepfakes. Offenders could face prosecution and penalties, with the justice ministry emphasizing that there is “no excuse” for creating such content without consent. This follows earlier proposals by the previous Conservative government, which also aimed to criminalize deepfake pornography, with offenders potentially facing fines or jail time.

In addition to the deepfake legislation, the government will introduce new offences related to taking intimate images without consent and installing equipment with the intent to create such content. Those found guilty could face up to two years in prison.

Victims Minister Alex Davies-Jones described this type of abuse as “demeaning and disgusting,” adding that it should not be normalized. Technology Minister Margaret Jones highlighted that tech platforms hosting such images will face stricter scrutiny and significant penalties. Campaigner Jess Davies emphasized that this form of abuse is causing “significant, long-lasting harm” to women and girls, resulting in a loss of control over their digital lives.

These new offences will be included in the government’s Crime and Policing Bill, which is expected to be introduced to parliament, though a date for its presentation has not yet been set.

 

US Appeals Court Blocks Biden Administration Effort to Restore Net-Neutrality Rules

A U.S. appeals court ruled on Thursday that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) did not have the legal authority to reinstate net neutrality rules. This decision is a setback for the Biden administration, which had made restoring the open internet rules a priority. In 2021, President Joe Biden signed an executive order urging the FCC to reinstate the rules, which were originally implemented in 2015 under President Barack Obama, then repealed by President Donald Trump’s FCC in 2017.

The ruling by a three-judge panel from the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Cincinnati, stated that the FCC lacked the authority to reinstate the net neutrality rules. These rules require internet service providers (ISPs) to treat internet data and users equally, prohibiting them from slowing speeds, restricting access, or blocking content. The rules also prevent ISPs from offering improved speeds or access to favored users.

The court’s decision cited the Supreme Court’s June ruling in the Loper Bright case, which overturned a 1984 precedent that had previously granted deference to government agencies in interpreting laws. This decision curtails the power of federal agencies, including the FCC. The ruling keeps state-level neutrality rules, such as those in California, in place but may effectively end over 20 years of efforts to provide federal oversight over the internet.

FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel called for Congress to act, emphasizing that consumers have expressed the desire for a fast, open, and fair internet. “With this decision, it is clear that Congress needs to take up the charge for net neutrality and put open internet principles into federal law,” Rosenworcel said.

Incoming FCC Chair Brendan Carr, who had voted against reinstating the rules, celebrated the court’s decision, criticizing the Biden administration’s attempts to expand regulatory control over the internet. Industry groups, including USTelecom, which represents major ISPs like AT&T and Verizon, applauded the ruling, claiming it would benefit consumers by fostering more investment, innovation, and competition in the digital marketplace.