Yazılar

Elon Musk’s X Now Valued 80% Less Than Purchase Price, According to Fidelity

The social media platform formerly known as Twitter, now X, has seen its value plunge nearly 80% since Elon Musk acquired it in October 2022. This staggering drop in valuation comes from estimates provided by Fidelity, a major investment firm that owns shares in X through its Blue Chip Growth Fund.

When Musk took Twitter private for $44 billion, it was a highly publicized acquisition. However, as of August 2024, Fidelity estimates that its shares in X are worth only $4.2 million, suggesting that the overall valuation of the company now stands at $9.4 billion—a far cry from the original purchase price. This represents a 24% drop from Fidelity’s own estimate in July and a 79% decline from its original valuation at the time of Musk’s purchase.

Declining Ad Revenue and Brand Safety Concerns

Fidelity’s assessment aligns with analysts’ concerns over X’s shrinking ad revenue, an issue compounded by the platform’s failure to publicly release financial metrics. Advertising has been a significant pain point for X since Musk’s acquisition, particularly with advertisers expressing discomfort over extreme content appearing on the platform. A Kantar global survey recently revealed that 26% of marketers plan to reduce ad spending on X in the coming year, with concerns over brand safety. Only 4% of advertisers believed their ads were safe from appearing near problematic content on X, compared to 39% on Google.

Musk’s public behavior has also contributed to advertiser unease. In November, he faced backlash after endorsing an antisemitic conspiracy theory. While he later apologized, he infamously told advertisers who were halting spending on X: “Go f**k yourself.”

Despite these setbacks, X remains a key player in social media with 570 million monthly active users in the second quarter of 2024, reflecting a 6% growth year-over-year. However, Similarweb data indicated declining engagement, particularly in the U.S., where X’s monthly active users on iOS and Android dropped 11% from the previous year and 20% since Musk’s acquisition.

Fidelity’s Estimate vs. Other Projections

While Fidelity’s valuation implies significant losses, not all experts agree with the extent of the decline. Gene Munster, managing partner at Deepwater Asset Management, argues that Fidelity is “overly aggressive” in its devaluation, believing the firm is simply cleaning house on its investment. Munster sees a longer-term potential in X’s vast data, particularly as a critical source of training material for Grok, an AI chatbot developed by xAI, Musk’s AI startup.

Dan Ives, an analyst at Wedbush Securities, suggested that Musk may have initially overpaid for Twitter, estimating its worth closer to $30 billion at the time of purchase and $15 billion today. However, Munster maintains optimism, noting that X’s value lies in the unique real-time data it provides, which is becoming increasingly valuable in the AI landscape. He added that Musk’s acquisition of Twitter might be a case of being “better lucky than smart,” given the rapid developments in AI.

X Reportedly Working on Feature to Disable Links in Post Replies

X Developing New Feature to Disable Links in Replies as Part of Its Vision to Become an “Everything App” Devamını Oku

Elon Musk’s X Sues Ad Industry Group Over Alleged Advertising ‘Boycott’

Elon Musk’s X has filed a lawsuit against the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM) and four prominent companies — CVS, Unilever, Mars, and Ørsted — alleging antitrust violations and accusing the group of orchestrating an advertising “boycott” against the platform. The lawsuit claims that GARM, an ad-industry initiative run by the World Federation of Advertisers, conspired to collectively withhold billions of dollars in advertising from Twitter, now rebranded as X, due to concerns over brand safety standards post-Musk’s acquisition in late 2022.

GARM aims to help brands avoid placing advertisements alongside illegal or harmful content. It comprises over 100 member companies who agree to adhere to GARM’s brand safety standards. The lawsuit alleges that after GARM publicly urged X to comply with these standards, many affiliated companies abruptly reduced or halted their advertising on the platform. This action, according to X, has significantly harmed its core ad business, which has struggled since Musk’s takeover due to fears of ads running alongside misinformation or hate speech.

X’s CEO, Linda Yaccarino, highlighted the dire situation in a video, stating that the alleged boycott threatens the company’s long-term viability. The lawsuit seeks to prevent GARM from continuing to make recommendations about advertising on X and requests unspecified monetary damages.

This lawsuit is part of a broader pattern of legal actions by X to address its declining ad revenue. Previously, X sued the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) and Media Matters, both watchdog groups, accusing them of distorting information about hate speech and extremist content on the platform, which they claim drove advertisers away. A federal judge dismissed the suit against CCDH, and the case against Media Matters is set for trial next year.