Yazılar

X Corp, owned by billionaire Elon Musk, has sued 18 major music publishers and a leading U.S. music industry trade group, alleging they conspired to block competition and force the platform to buy music licenses at inflated prices. The lawsuit, filed on Friday in a federal district court in Texas, accuses the National Music Publishers’ Association along with major publishers including Sony Music, Universal Music Group and Warner Chappell of violating U.S. antitrust law. X alleges the publishers collectively refused to negotiate individual licensing agreements, instead pushing industrywide terms that the company says are anti-competitive. “X has been denied the ability to acquire a U.S. musical-composition license from any individual music publisher on competitive terms,” the complaint said. David Israelite, president and CEO of the National Music Publishers’ Association, rejected the claims, saying X is the only major social media platform that does not properly license music. “We allege that X has engaged in copyright infringement for years, and its meritless lawsuit is a bad faith effort to distract from publishers’ and songwriters’ legitimate right to enforce against X’s illegal use of their songs,” he said in a statement. Sony Music referred Reuters to the association’s response and declined further comment. Universal Music and Warner Chappell did not immediately respond to requests for comment. X also did not respond to a request for comment. According to the lawsuit, publishers representing more than 90% of U.S. copyrighted music coordinated their actions through the trade group. X said the publishers have issued thousands of takedown notices each week, targeting posts that contain copyrighted music — including those from high-profile accounts — in an effort to pressure the platform into accepting collective licensing terms. X said it has removed thousands of posts and suspended more than 50,000 users as a result, hurting its user engagement and advertising revenue. The company is asking the court to restore what it calls competitive conditions in music licensing and to award damages for lost ad revenue. The case follows earlier legal battles between X and music publishers. In 2024, X won dismissal of most claims in a lawsuit filed in 2023 by 17 publishers, including Sony and Universal, who accused the platform of infringing copyrights on nearly 1,700 songs and sought more than $250 million in damages. X said in Friday’s filing that some of the publishers involved in past litigation have been willing to negotiate individual settlements.

X Corp, owned by billionaire Elon Musk, has sued 18 major music publishers and a leading U.S. music industry trade group, alleging they conspired to block competition and force the platform to buy music licenses at inflated prices.

The lawsuit, filed on Friday in a federal district court in Texas, accuses the National Music Publishers’ Association along with major publishers including Sony Music, Universal Music Group and Warner Chappell of violating U.S. antitrust law. X alleges the publishers collectively refused to negotiate individual licensing agreements, instead pushing industrywide terms that the company says are anti-competitive.

“X has been denied the ability to acquire a U.S. musical-composition license from any individual music publisher on competitive terms,” the complaint said.

David Israelite, president and CEO of the National Music Publishers’ Association, rejected the claims, saying X is the only major social media platform that does not properly license music. “We allege that X has engaged in copyright infringement for years, and its meritless lawsuit is a bad faith effort to distract from publishers’ and songwriters’ legitimate right to enforce against X’s illegal use of their songs,” he said in a statement.

Sony Music referred Reuters to the association’s response and declined further comment. Universal Music and Warner Chappell did not immediately respond to requests for comment. X also did not respond to a request for comment.

According to the lawsuit, publishers representing more than 90% of U.S. copyrighted music coordinated their actions through the trade group. X said the publishers have issued thousands of takedown notices each week, targeting posts that contain copyrighted music — including those from high-profile accounts — in an effort to pressure the platform into accepting collective licensing terms.

X said it has removed thousands of posts and suspended more than 50,000 users as a result, hurting its user engagement and advertising revenue. The company is asking the court to restore what it calls competitive conditions in music licensing and to award damages for lost ad revenue.

The case follows earlier legal battles between X and music publishers. In 2024, X won dismissal of most claims in a lawsuit filed in 2023 by 17 publishers, including Sony and Universal, who accused the platform of infringing copyrights on nearly 1,700 songs and sought more than $250 million in damages. X said in Friday’s filing that some of the publishers involved in past litigation have been willing to negotiate individual settlements.

Apple and OpenAI Seek Dismissal of Elon Musk’s Antitrust Lawsuit

Apple and OpenAI have jointly asked a U.S. judge to dismiss a lawsuit filed by Elon Musk’s xAI, which accuses the two companies of engaging in anticompetitive behavior through their AI partnership.

The lawsuit, filed in August, alleges that Apple’s deal with OpenAI — which integrates ChatGPT into iPhones, iPads, and Macs — is “exclusive” and unfairly limits competition by sidelining Musk’s X platform and its Grok chatbot.

APPLE AND OPENAI REJECT CLAIMS OF MONOPOLY

In court filings on Tuesday, Apple’s lawyers stated that the company’s deal with OpenAI is not exclusive and does not restrict competition in any way.

“Apple and OpenAI’s agreement is expressly not exclusive, and it is public and widely known that Apple intends to partner with other generative AI chatbots,” Apple’s filing said.

OpenAI echoed this argument, accusing Musk of engaging in a “campaign of lawfare” — using lawsuits to attack competitors — and said xAI had failed to demonstrate any concrete harm.

“Musk’s claims are purely speculative,” OpenAI’s attorneys wrote. “xAI has not alleged any direct or anticompetitive harm resulting from ChatGPT’s integration as an option on certain iPhones.”

BACKGROUND OF THE DISPUTE

Apple and OpenAI’s collaboration, announced in June 2024, made ChatGPT accessible across Apple’s ecosystem, allowing users to access the chatbot through Siri and other built-in applications.

Musk, who co-founded OpenAI in 2015 as a nonprofit before it transitioned into a for-profit structure under CEO Sam Altman, has since become one of its harshest critics. He argues that OpenAI has abandoned its original mission of open and safe AI development.

Musk’s company xAI, launched in 2023, operates the Grok chatbot integrated into his social media platform X (formerly Twitter). xAI’s lawsuit seeks billions in damages, claiming Apple’s partnership with OpenAI harms fair market competition.

Musk is also pursuing a separate lawsuit against OpenAI and Altman in California federal court, seeking to reverse the company’s for-profit conversion.

xAI has not yet responded publicly to Apple and OpenAI’s latest motion for dismissal.

Judge Rejects Apple’s Bid to Dismiss U.S. Antitrust Lawsuit over iPhone Market Power

Apple must face a U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) lawsuit accusing it of unlawfully maintaining monopoly power in the U.S. smartphone market, a federal judge ruled on Monday. The decision paves the way for a potentially years-long legal battle over Apple’s business practices.

U.S. District Judge Julien Neals in Newark, New Jersey, denied Apple’s motion to dismiss the case, which centers on how the company allegedly uses technical and contractual restrictions to limit competition. The DOJ, joined by several states and Washington, D.C., argues that Apple has implemented policies that discourage users from switching to rival devices and suppress third-party innovation in areas like apps, smartwatches, messaging, and digital wallets.

An Apple spokesperson responded by saying the company believes the lawsuit is flawed in both fact and law, and vowed to vigorously defend itself in court. The DOJ declined to comment on the ruling.

Apple’s iPhone, the world’s most popular smartphone, generated $201 billion in sales in 2024. The tech giant introduced a new budget iPhone model in February, pricing it $170 higher than the previous version despite added features.

The antitrust case, filed in March 2024, argues that Apple’s practices—including restricting app developer access, imposing high fees, and limiting device interoperability—create unlawful barriers to competition. Apple counters that these policies are necessary for security and innovation, and that being forced to share proprietary technology could undermine its product ecosystem.

This case joins a broader wave of U.S. antitrust actions against major tech companies, spanning both the Biden and Trump administrations. Meta Platforms and Amazon are also facing monopoly lawsuits, while Google-owner Alphabet is battling two separate antitrust cases.