Yazılar

Accenture to Acquire Australian Cybersecurity Firm CyberCX in $650 Million Deal

Accenture (ACN.N) announced on Thursday that it will acquire Australian cybersecurity company CyberCX in what represents its largest-ever deal in the sector. The Australian Financial Review reported the transaction is valued at over A$1 billion ($650 million).

The deal highlights the growing demand for advanced cybersecurity services as businesses face increasingly sophisticated digital threats. Australia has seen a series of high-profile cyberattacks, including the 2022 Optus breach that exposed data of up to 10 million users, and a Medibank hack affecting nearly 10 million customers. In July, Qantas Airways also reported a breach of one of its call centres, impacting six million customers.

Melbourne-based CyberCX was created in 2019 through the merger of 12 smaller cybersecurity firms backed by private equity firm BGH Capital, which is selling the company. CyberCX employs around 1,400 staff and operates security operations centres across Australia and New Zealand, with additional offices in London and New York.

The company is led by John Paitaridis, formerly managing director of Optus Business, and Chief Strategy Officer Alastair MacGibbon, who previously served as Australia’s national cybersecurity coordinator. Their experience is notable given Optus’ 2022 data breach that compromised names, dates of birth, addresses, phone numbers, emails, and passport and driver’s license information.

Accenture has been actively expanding its security services, completing 20 acquisitions in the sector since 2015, including Brazilian firm Morphus, MNEMO Mexico, and Spain-based Innotec Security. Domestically, Accenture signed a $700 million collaborative agreement with Telstra in February to implement AI capabilities across the telecommunications company.

Australian Court Partly Rules Against Apple and Google in Epic Games Antitrust Case

An Australian federal court has ruled that Apple’s App Store and Google’s Android app marketplace engage in uncompetitive practices, handing Epic Games a partial victory in its long-running legal battle against the tech giants.

The 2,000-page judgment, not yet publicly released, found that Apple and Google’s app stores lacked safeguards against anti-competitive behavior. However, the court also determined that the companies had not intentionally violated the law, local media reported.

Epic Games argued that both Apple and Google charged excessive fees for app downloads and in-app purchases while blocking users from installing alternative app stores. In response to the ruling, Epic said on X that the decision confirmed the companies “abuse their control over app distribution and in-app payments to limit competition.” The company also announced that Fortnite and the Epic Games Store would soon be available on iOS devices in Australia, calling it a win for both developers and consumers.

Apple welcomed the court’s dismissal of some of Epic’s claims but expressed strong disagreement with the findings on competition, maintaining that it faces “fierce competition in every market where we operate.” Google similarly said it would review the full judgment but disagreed with the court’s characterization of its billing practices and certain historical partnerships.

The ruling adds to Epic Games’ global campaign challenging the dominance of app distribution systems controlled by Apple and Google, which has included high-profile cases in the United States and Europe.

Australia’s eSafety Commissioner Criticizes YouTube, Apple for Failing to Address Child Abuse Material

Australia’s internet safety regulator, the eSafety Commissioner, released a report on Wednesday accusing major social media platforms, notably YouTube and Apple, of “turning a blind eye” to online child sexual abuse material (CSAM). The watchdog highlighted YouTube’s unresponsiveness to inquiries and its failure to track user reports and response times related to CSAM.

The report found that YouTube, along with Apple, could not provide data on the number of user reports about child abuse content or the speed of their responses. The Australian government recently decided to include YouTube in its groundbreaking ban on social media use for teenagers, reversing an earlier exemption based on the Commissioner’s advice.

Julie Inman Grant, eSafety Commissioner, stated that these companies fail to prioritize child protection and are allowing serious crimes to occur unchecked on their platforms. She emphasized that no other consumer-facing industry would be permitted to operate while enabling such crimes.

In response, a Google spokesperson clarified that eSafety’s criticisms were based on reporting metrics rather than overall safety performance, noting that YouTube proactively removes over 99% of abuse content before it is flagged or viewed.

The report also assessed other platforms, including Meta (Facebook, Instagram, Threads), Apple, Discord, Microsoft, Skype, Snap, and WhatsApp, finding “safety deficiencies” such as failures to detect or block livestreaming of abuse content, inadequate reporting mechanisms, and inconsistent use of hash-matching technology to identify known abuse images.

Despite warnings in prior years, some companies have not sufficiently addressed these gaps. The report specifically noted that Apple and YouTube did not disclose how many trust and safety staff they employ or detailed information about user reports on child abuse content.