Yazılar

Brazil Judge Demands Big Tech Compliance with Local Laws to Continue Operations

/in /tarafından

Brazilian Supreme Court judge Alexandre de Moraes stated on Wednesday that tech firms must comply with local laws to remain operational in the country, highlighting the government’s firm stance on regulating online platforms. While he did not name any specific companies, his remarks followed a recent announcement by Meta to scale back its U.S. fact-checking program and reduce restrictions on discussions about sensitive issues like immigration and gender identity.

Moraes, speaking at an event marking the second anniversary of the 2021 riots in Brazil, emphasized that the court would not allow companies to profit from hate speech. “In Brazil, (the companies) will only continue to operate if they respect Brazilian legislation, regardless of the rant of Big Tech managers,” he asserted.

This statement comes after Brazil’s Supreme Court had temporarily suspended the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) for over a month last year for failing to comply with court orders, including those related to moderating hate speech. Judge Moraes issued the initial suspension order, which was later unanimously upheld by a five-member panel. In response, X’s owner, Elon Musk, denounced the action as censorship but ultimately complied by blocking certain accounts to resume operations in Brazil.

In a separate development, Brazilian prosecutors have ordered Meta to clarify whether its changes to the fact-checking program in the U.S. will also apply in Brazil. Meta, which did not comment on the matter through its Brazil office, was given a 30-day deadline to respond. This order is part of an ongoing investigation into how social media platforms address misinformation and online violence in Brazil.

 

EU Assesses Big Tech Cases Ahead of Trump’s Arrival

/in /tarafından

The European Commission affirmed on Tuesday that it is proceeding with its investigations into U.S. Big Tech companies, including Apple, Alphabet, X, and Meta, and stressed that President-elect Donald Trump’s return to the White House would not alter its commitment to enforcing European laws. The EU has been at the forefront of examining whether these companies have violated laws designed to prevent them from gaining an unfair advantage over competitors.

Trump, who will begin his second term on Monday, has been critical of several European policies, while his ally Elon Musk has clashed with EU regulators on multiple occasions. Reports surfaced on Tuesday suggesting that Brussels might reassess its ongoing investigations of Big Tech, potentially scaling back or altering the scope of the probes at the request of U.S. companies seeking Trump’s intervention.

However, Henna Virkkunen, the EU commissioner responsible for policy, reassured Reuters that investigations are proceeding as usual and no decisions have been made to suspend them. A spokesperson for the European Commission emphasized that the assessments were routine and unrelated to Trump’s upcoming presidency. The focus of these assessments is on evaluating the progress of cases, the allocation of resources, and the overall readiness of investigations.

U.S. tech companies have long complained that European regulations stifle innovation and impose hefty fines. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently urged Trump to intervene and prevent further fines from the EU. He likened the EU’s competition enforcement to a “tariff” on U.S. firms. The Digital Markets Act (DMA), Digital Services Act (DSA), and the EU AI Act have drawn particular criticism from tech industry leaders, including Musk, who was scrutinized earlier this month after hosting controversial figures on his X platform.

The EU’s investigations, which can take several years, have already resulted in significant penalties. Last November, Meta was fined nearly 800 million euros ($821 million) for anti-competitive practices. Ongoing investigations into X, Apple, and Alphabet have yet to reach a conclusion.

In the face of criticism, Thierry Breton, the former EU industry chief, urged that the Commission resist efforts to weaken its regulations, asserting that regulation is not censorship.

 

Geothermal Startups See Growth as AI Demand Rises but Face Rivalry from Natural Gas

/in /tarafından

Geothermal energy is gaining traction as a sustainable solution to power the energy-hungry AI data centers of major tech companies like Meta and Google. However, the path forward remains uncertain due to stiff competition from natural gas and the high upfront costs of geothermal projects.

The Rise of Geothermal for AI Energy Needs

Big Tech firms are partnering with geothermal startups to supply clean energy for their data centers. These partnerships are part of a broader push to meet the growing energy demands of AI technologies while accelerating investments in renewable energy.

Trey Lowe, Chief Technology Officer of Devon Energy, a shale gas producer and investor in geothermal startup Fervo Energy, highlights the potential: “We believe geothermal, along with abundant natural gas, can be part of the all-of-the-above energy mix we need to meet the demand.”

Geothermal energy offers advantages such as faster carbon-free electricity generation compared to nuclear energy and reliability over intermittent sources like wind and solar. Despite these benefits, challenges like high drilling costs and lengthy project approvals have tempered initial enthusiasm.

Investments and Industry Shifts

Since 2020, geothermal projects have attracted an estimated $700 million in funding. While startups like Sage Geosystems and Gradient Geothermal are pushing forward with innovative approaches, larger oil majors like Chevron and Exxon Mobil remain focused on natural gas, often coupled with carbon sequestration to lower emissions.

Sage Geosystems, for instance, recently raised $30 million and is planning a Series B funding round in January. Gradient Geothermal is leveraging existing oil and gas infrastructure to generate geothermal energy, a cost-effective strategy gaining interest among mid-sized energy firms.

Geothermal energy’s cost competitiveness is a key factor driving its appeal. The average levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) for geothermal projects in the U.S. stands at $64 per megawatt-hour (MWh), lower than combined-cycle natural gas ($77/MWh) and significantly cheaper than nuclear energy ($182/MWh).

The Texas Geothermal Boom

Texas is emerging as a hub for geothermal development, thanks to its abundant resources, streamlined permitting process, and regulatory certainty. Ten of the 22 geothermal startups launched in the U.S. between 2016 and 2022 are headquartered in Texas.

According to Matt Welch of the Texas Geothermal Energy Alliance, “Texas is becoming the ‘place to be’ for geothermal exploration and development across the board.”

Legislative and Market Support

Lower commodity prices are pushing shale companies to diversify revenue streams, with geothermal becoming a viable option. Bipartisan legislative interest, such as the recently passed CLEAN Act and HEATS Act, could further simplify the process of setting up geothermal projects in the U.S., boosting the sector’s growth.

Trey Lowe of Devon Energy notes that government incentives and the stability of geothermal investments are attracting more private capital: “A combination of a low decline asset with high certainty on pricing piques the interest of many investors.”

Challenges and Outlook

While geothermal energy has significant potential, its growth is clouded by competition from natural gas and the reluctance of major oil companies to commit fully. For geothermal to become a cornerstone of the energy mix, continued investment, innovation, and supportive policy frameworks will be essential.