Yazılar

Reuters X Account Restored in India Following Suspension Over Legal Request

/in /tarafından

News account on X was reinstated in India on Sunday, a day after the social media platform suspended it citing a legal demand, according to an email from X to Reuters’ social media team. X did not provide further details on the reason for the restoration.

Earlier, the Reuters account — which has over 25 million global followers — had been blocked in India since Saturday night, with a notice stating that the suspension was in response to a legal demand under India’s Information Technology Act, 2000. This law allows government officials to order removal of content deemed to violate local laws, including issues of national security or public order.

The Indian government’s Press Information Bureau denied that any agency requested the handle be withheld and said officials were working with X to resolve the issue. Reuters and X representatives did not immediately comment on the restoration.

Another Reuters-operated account, Reuters World, also blocked in India, was restored late Sunday night.

The earlier suspension followed an email sent to Reuters on May 16, informing them of a legal request to remove certain content from their X account in compliance with Indian law. However, the exact content targeted, the requesting entity, and whether this email was connected to the suspension remain unclear.

X has faced ongoing disputes with India over content removal requests. In March, X sued the Indian government over a new website it argued expanded government powers for content takedowns, a case that is ongoing.

India Rebukes X Over “Tom, Dick, and Harry” Remark in Ongoing Court Battle on Content Takedowns

/in /tarafından

A legal clash between Elon Musk’s X (formerly Twitter) and the Indian government intensified on Tuesday after X’s lawyer made a controversial remark suggesting that “every Tom, Dick, and Harry” government official could issue takedown orders on online content. The statement drew a sharp and immediate rebuke from India’s Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, escalating a long-standing standoff over digital content regulation.

The remark came during a hearing at the Karnataka High Court, where X is challenging a government-run website that it alleges serves as a “censorship portal.” The Indian government, however, defends the portal as a tool for swiftly notifying social media platforms of legal obligations under content moderation laws.

X’s lawyer, K.G. Raghavan, cited a recent example where the Indian Railways ordered the takedown of a video showing a car being driven on a railway track—content X considered newsworthy. “This is the danger… if every Tom, Dick, and Harry officer is authorised,” he argued.

Solicitor General Mehta strongly objected, stating, “Officers are not Tom, Dick, or Harry… they are statutory functionaries.” He further defended India’s regulatory approach, saying, “No social media intermediary can expect completely unregulated functioning.”

The Indian Information Technology Ministry and X did not issue public responses to Reuters’ inquiries following the courtroom exchange.

India has become a strategically important market for Musk’s expanding empire, particularly with upcoming plans to launch Starlink and Tesla in the country. However, X’s friction with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s administration over content moderation continues to cast a shadow over those ambitions.

The roots of the conflict trace back to 2021, when X refused to comply with Indian orders to block specific tweets. Although it eventually yielded to the demands, the platform has continued to contest the legality of those directives in Indian courts.

Tuesday’s court exchange underscores the ongoing tension between tech giants and sovereign governments over who has the final say in regulating online content—and how far that power should extend.

Vietnam Orders Block on Telegram Over Crime, Anti-State Content Allegations

/in /tarafından

Vietnam’s Ministry of Information and Communications has instructed telecommunication providers to block access to the Telegram messaging app, citing the platform’s alleged failure to cooperate in investigations into criminal activity and anti-state operations.

The directive, dated May 21 and signed by the deputy head of the telecom department, mandates Vietnamese telecom operators to “deploy solutions and measures to prevent Telegram’s activities” and report progress by June 2.

Authorities claim that 68% of the 9,600 Telegram channels and groups active in Vietnam have violated national laws, pointing to incidents of fraud, drug trafficking, and suspected terrorism-related content. Officials also accused Telegram of refusing to share user data when requested as part of ongoing criminal probes.

Telegram Responds

Telegram, which has close to 1 billion global users, expressed surprise at the allegations. A company spokesperson told Reuters:

“We have responded to legal requests from Vietnam on time… We received a formal notice this morning regarding a standard service notification procedure under new telecom regulations. The deadline for our response is May 27, and we are processing the request.”

Despite the government’s order, Telegram remained accessible in Vietnam as of Friday.

Crackdown on Online Content

Vietnam’s ruling Communist Party, known for its tight grip on media and limited tolerance for dissent, has stepped up demands on global tech firms to cooperate with state censorship policies. The country has previously pressured platforms such as Facebook, YouTube, Google, and TikTok to remove content deemed “toxic” or “anti-state.”

The government’s document also accused Telegram of enabling opposition groups to organize and spread anti-government propaganda, with “many groups with tens of thousands of participants” allegedly created by what it called “reactionary subjects.”

Broader Context

Telegram has faced scrutiny globally for its perceived lack of content moderation. In France, founder Pavel Durov was briefly detained last year amid similar concerns over security and data transparency.

The timing of Vietnam’s move also comes ahead of an official visit by French President Emmanuel Macron to Hanoi on Sunday, potentially adding diplomatic nuance to the unfolding situation.