Yazılar

EU’s Top Court Adviser Supports Italy in Meta Platforms Copyright Dispute

/in /tarafından

An adviser to the European Union’s highest court stated on Thursday that EU member states have the right to implement their own measures to strengthen the position of news publishers in negotiations with large online platforms, provided these do not infringe on freedom of contract.

The dispute under review by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) involves Meta Platforms, owner of Facebook, and Italy’s communications regulator AGCOM. The case centers on a fee that Meta must pay Italian publishers for using snippets of their news articles.

Meta challenged whether national measures like Italy’s are compatible with rights granted to publishers under EU copyright law. However, CJEU Advocate General Maciej Szpunar argued that EU copyright rules aim not only to protect publishers from unpaid use of their content but also to ensure they receive a fair share of revenue generated by platforms.

Szpunar emphasized the public interest behind these rules, describing them as efforts to support the economic viability of the press, which he called “a key pillar of democracy.”

Meta said it will await the court’s final ruling but expressed concerns that Italy’s implementation of the directive undermines the goal of copyright harmonization in Europe. A Meta spokesperson warned that inconsistent legislation can hinder innovation and create uncertainty.

The adviser also noted that Italy’s regulator must respect contractual freedom. Szpunar said AGCOM’s powers—such as setting remuneration benchmarks, resolving disputes, and monitoring information—are acceptable if they serve only to assist and do not restrict the parties’ freedom to contract.

The CJEU is expected to issue its decision in the coming months, and it often aligns with the advocate-general’s recommendations.

Huawei’s AI Lab Denies Copying Alibaba’s Qwen Model Amid Copyright Claims

/in /tarafından

Huawei’s AI research division, Noah Ark Lab, has denied allegations that its Pangu Pro Moe (Mixture of Experts) large language model copied from Alibaba’s Qwen 2.5 14B model. The lab insisted on Saturday that Pangu Pro was independently developed and trained, refuting claims made in a report by an entity named HonestAGI.

HonestAGI published a paper on GitHub claiming “extraordinary correlation” between Huawei’s Pangu Pro Moe and Alibaba’s Qwen model, suggesting that Huawei’s model might have been “upcycled” rather than trained from scratch. The report also raised concerns about potential copyright violations and false claims regarding Huawei’s investment in the model’s training.

In response, Noah Ark Lab stated that their model is not based on incremental training from other manufacturers’ models but instead includes key innovations in architecture and technical features. They highlighted that Pangu Pro is the first large-scale model built entirely on Huawei’s Ascend chips and confirmed adherence to open-source licensing rules for any third-party code used—though they did not specify which open-source models influenced their work.

Alibaba has yet to comment on the allegations, and the identity of HonestAGI remains unknown. The controversy comes amid rising competition in China’s AI sector, which has been accelerated by the release of open-source models like DeepSeek’s R1 and Alibaba’s Qwen family, designed for consumer and chatbot applications. In contrast, Huawei’s Pangu models are primarily applied in government, finance, and manufacturing sectors.