Yazılar

US Court Blocks New Jersey From Regulating Kalshi Prediction Market

A federal appeals court has ruled that New Jersey regulators cannot block Kalshi from offering its prediction market services in the state, marking a significant development in the legal battle over the regulation of event-based trading.

The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals determined that oversight of Kalshi’s contracts falls under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), rather than state gaming authorities.

Kalshi allows users to trade contracts tied to real-world outcomes, including sports and political events. While states like New Jersey argue these resemble gambling and should be subject to local laws, Kalshi maintains that its products qualify as financial derivatives regulated at the federal level.

The court’s 2–1 decision sided with Kalshi, affirming that its event contracts are legally classified as “swaps” traded on a CFTC-approved platform. This classification effectively preempts state-level restrictions under existing federal law.

The ruling represents a key precedent in an ongoing nationwide dispute, as multiple states attempt to regulate or restrict prediction markets. Some courts have issued conflicting decisions, and further legal challenges are expected.

New Jersey officials have indicated they are reviewing their options, which could include seeking a rehearing. Meanwhile, the case underscores the growing tension between traditional gambling regulation frameworks and emerging financial-style betting platforms.

Greek Court Rules in Spy Case

A Greek court has found four individuals guilty of breaching personal data in connection with a surveillance controversy that emerged earlier this decade.

The case relates to allegations involving unauthorized monitoring through mobile software during 2020–2021. The ruling includes prison sentences, though the time to be served remains subject to appeal.

The decision follows years of legal scrutiny into claims that journalists and political figures were targeted through digital surveillance tools. The matter has drawn significant attention within Greece and beyond, raising concerns about privacy and oversight.

Authorities have also referred aspects of the case for further investigation into potential additional offences.

The development represents a key milestone in ongoing legal proceedings related to the broader wiretapping scandal.

Court Allows Lawsuit Against Amazon

The Washington Supreme Court has ruled that Amazon must face lawsuits from families who claim the company was negligent in allowing the sale of sodium nitrite linked to fatal incidents.

The unanimous decision overturned a lower court ruling that had dismissed the claims, stating that the lawsuits can proceed under state product liability law.

The families argue that Amazon was aware of the risks associated with the substance yet continued to sell it without additional safeguards.

The ruling does not determine liability but allows the legal process to move forward.

The case highlights ongoing scrutiny of online marketplaces and their responsibilities in managing potentially harmful products.