Yazılar

Trump’s AI plan backs antitrust scrutiny, DOJ official says

/in /tarafından

U.S. antitrust authorities are closely watching the artificial intelligence industry for anticompetitive practices as part of the Trump administration’s broader push to secure American leadership in AI, a senior Justice Department official said on Thursday.

Speaking at Fordham University, Assistant Attorney General Gail Slater emphasized that protecting competition in the AI sector is key to fostering innovation. “The competitive dynamics of each layer of the AI stack and how they interrelate, with a particular eye towards exclusionary behavior that forecloses access to key inputs and distribution channels, are legitimate areas for antitrust inquiry,” she said.

One major focus will be access to data. Slater noted that a judge in Washington recently ordered Alphabet’s Google (GOOGL.O) to share some search data with rivals, including AI firms, to strengthen competition in online search. Google has said it will appeal the ruling.

Slater added that demand for data could fuel vertical integration—mergers between companies and their suppliers—especially in sensitive areas such as healthcare. “We may also increasingly see the desire to acquire data, or to deprive rivals of data, play a role in driving transactions,” she said.

Open-source AI models are another area of interest. Slater said such models can enhance competition, but stressed that “a truly open-source model must be one that is not unilaterally maintained by a single vendor that exerts unwarranted influence and impose restrictions.”

Concerns about AI competition were also voiced during President Joe Biden’s administration, which scrutinized Big Tech’s partnerships with AI startups. Trump’s AI plan, however, explicitly ties antitrust enforcement to the goal of strengthening U.S. dominance in the sector.

US Lawmakers Demand Chinese Telecoms Detail Ties to Military and Government

/in /tarafından

The leaders of a U.S. House of Representatives panel have urged top Chinese telecom companies to provide detailed information about any connections to the Chinese military and government, citing national security concerns over their operations in the U.S. Representatives Raja Krishnamoorthi, the top Democrat on the House Select Committee on China, and Republican John Moolenaar, the committee chair, have sent letters to China Mobile, China Telecom, and China Unicom, requesting responses by March 31.

The lawmakers expressed concerns that the companies could misuse their access to U.S. data through cloud and internet services, potentially sharing sensitive information with the Chinese government. This follows a 2024 Reuters report revealing a U.S. Commerce Department investigation into these companies’ operations in the U.S. and the potential security risks they pose.

In one letter, the committee raised alarms about China Telecom’s operations, particularly its role in internet backbone exchanges and cloud computing. The lawmakers warned that such operations could facilitate unauthorized data access, espionage, or sabotage by the Chinese government. They also highlighted the companies’ documented connections to Chinese intelligence, intensifying national security concerns amid China’s increasing cyber-attacks on U.S. telecommunications infrastructure.

The letters reflect growing bipartisan concern over Chinese telecom firms’ U.S. presence, especially after significant cyber-attacks tied to Chinese state-backed groups. Two prominent cyber incidents—Salt Typhoon and Volt Typhoon—have been linked to Chinese government entities, with the latter described by the FBI as the largest cyber-espionage campaign in U.S. history. Beijing has denied any involvement in these attacks.

China Telecom, China Mobile, and China Unicom have long been under scrutiny in Washington. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) denied China Mobile’s application to offer U.S. telecom services in 2019 and revoked China Telecom and China Unicom’s authorizations in 2021 and 2022. In 2024, the FCC moved to bar these companies from offering broadband services, but the decision was blocked by a court. Despite these regulatory actions, the companies still retain the ability to provide cloud services and handle U.S. internet traffic, thus maintaining access to Americans’ data.