Yazılar

Nvidia’s $100B OpenAI deal sparks antitrust scrutiny over AI dominance

/in /tarafından

Nvidia’s plan to invest up to $100 billion in OpenAI — while supplying the ChatGPT maker with millions of AI chips — is raising alarms among antitrust experts who warn the partnership could distort competition in a market already dominated by a handful of tech giants.

Nvidia controls more than half of the GPU market, the essential chips powering AI data centers. Experts caution that a financial tie to OpenAI could give Nvidia incentives to favor one customer over rivals through preferential pricing or faster delivery. “They’re financially interested in each other’s success. That creates an incentive for Nvidia to not sell chips to, or not sell chips on the same terms to, other competitors of OpenAI,” said Rebecca Haw Allensworth, a Vanderbilt Law School antitrust professor.

Andre Barlow, an antitrust lawyer, said the deal raises “significant antitrust concerns,” though the Trump administration’s pro-business stance complicates the outlook. President Donald Trump has emphasized both removing regulatory hurdles to accelerate AI growth and using antitrust enforcement to ensure long-term competition.

The scale of the deal highlights how expensive frontier AI has become. “The cost of chips, data centers and power has pushed the industry toward a handful of firms able to finance projects on that scale,” said Sarah Kreps, director of the Tech Policy Institute at Cornell University. Nvidia’s top two customers already account for nearly 40% of its revenue, underscoring its reliance on concentrated buyers.

Under President Biden, regulators had warned Big Tech could use scale to dominate AI. The DOJ and FTC pursued early inquiries into exclusionary conduct around AI resources. The Trump administration has kept many Big Tech cases alive, with DOJ antitrust head Gail Slater saying last week enforcement must focus on preventing bottlenecks: “The competitive dynamics of each layer of the AI stack and how they interrelate… are legitimate areas for antitrust inquiry.”

For now, Nvidia insists its investment won’t alter its sales practices: “We will continue to make every customer a top priority, with or without any equity stake,” a spokesperson said. OpenAI declined to comment.

Google fights DOJ push to break up ad tech business as antitrust trial opens

/in /tarafından

Alphabet’s Google is back in court, facing a U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) bid to force it to divest parts of its online advertising empire. The antitrust trial, which opened Monday in Alexandria, Virginia, could reshape the digital ad market if the government succeeds.

The DOJ and a coalition of states want Google to sell its ad exchange AdX, which charges publishers a 20% fee to auction ads in real time, and to make the auction’s decision-making mechanism open source. Prosecutors argue that only structural remedies like divestiture can address Google’s illegal monopolization, after U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema ruled earlier this year that Google unlawfully tied AdX to its publisher ad server.

“Leaving Google with the motive and the means to recreate that tie is simply too great a risk,” DOJ attorney Julia Tarver Wood said in opening statements.

Google’s lawyer Karen Dunn pushed back, calling the proposals “radical and reckless,” claiming they would harm competition by giving regulators “broad and unparalleled power” over a major tech platform. Instead, Google has offered policy changes that would make it easier for publishers to work with rivals — but the DOJ insists such tweaks are insufficient.

The trial follows a recent DOJ loss in a separate search monopoly case, where a Washington, D.C. judge refused to impose most of the government’s remedies. But prosecutors argue this case is different, since ad tech is the monopoly itself rather than just a distribution method.

Industry stakeholders are closely watching the outcome. Grant Whitmore of Advance Local, which runs local news outlets in eight states, testified that Google’s control of advertiser tools, publisher tools, and the AdX exchange “offers a lot of opportunities for Google to continue to put their thumb on the scale.” He said Google should also be forced to sell its publisher ad server.

Google has previously floated selling AdX to settle an EU investigation, according to Reuters, and internal documents from those talks may surface during this trial.

The case is part of a broader bipartisan effort to curb Big Tech power, with ongoing actions against Meta, Amazon, and Apple. The stakes are high: a forced breakup of Google’s ad tech stack would mark one of the most significant antitrust interventions in the digital economy’s history.

Trump’s AI plan backs antitrust scrutiny, DOJ official says

/in /tarafından

U.S. antitrust authorities are closely watching the artificial intelligence industry for anticompetitive practices as part of the Trump administration’s broader push to secure American leadership in AI, a senior Justice Department official said on Thursday.

Speaking at Fordham University, Assistant Attorney General Gail Slater emphasized that protecting competition in the AI sector is key to fostering innovation. “The competitive dynamics of each layer of the AI stack and how they interrelate, with a particular eye towards exclusionary behavior that forecloses access to key inputs and distribution channels, are legitimate areas for antitrust inquiry,” she said.

One major focus will be access to data. Slater noted that a judge in Washington recently ordered Alphabet’s Google (GOOGL.O) to share some search data with rivals, including AI firms, to strengthen competition in online search. Google has said it will appeal the ruling.

Slater added that demand for data could fuel vertical integration—mergers between companies and their suppliers—especially in sensitive areas such as healthcare. “We may also increasingly see the desire to acquire data, or to deprive rivals of data, play a role in driving transactions,” she said.

Open-source AI models are another area of interest. Slater said such models can enhance competition, but stressed that “a truly open-source model must be one that is not unilaterally maintained by a single vendor that exerts unwarranted influence and impose restrictions.”

Concerns about AI competition were also voiced during President Joe Biden’s administration, which scrutinized Big Tech’s partnerships with AI startups. Trump’s AI plan, however, explicitly ties antitrust enforcement to the goal of strengthening U.S. dominance in the sector.