Yazılar

Google Agrees to Play Store Changes in Settlement With Epic Games

Epic Games Store current free games | PC Gamer

Alphabet’s Google announced on Tuesday that it has reached a comprehensive U.S. court settlement with Epic Games, the maker of Fortnite, to implement a series of Play Store reforms. The agreement, which marks the end of a multi-year legal battle, focuses on lowering app store fees, boosting competition, and expanding choices for both developers and consumers within the Android ecosystem.

In a joint filing submitted to the U.S. District Court in San Francisco, Google and Epic Games requested that Judge James Donato review and approve the proposed settlement. The agreement seeks to resolve Epic’s 2020 antitrust lawsuit, which accused Google of maintaining an illegal monopoly over how users download apps and make in-app purchases on Android devices.

The lawsuit had been one of the most closely watched cases in the global debate over app store dominance and developer fairness, echoing Epic’s earlier legal clash with Apple. Epic argued that Google’s policies restricted competition by forcing developers to use its billing system and pay service fees that limited their ability to offer lower prices or alternative payment options.

While Google has denied any wrongdoing throughout the proceedings, the settlement signals a significant step toward reforming the Play Store’s business model. If approved, the proposed changes could reshape how Android app distribution and monetization work—potentially setting new standards for transparency, competition, and developer empowerment across the mobile ecosystem.

Google Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Halt App Store Ruling in Epic Games Case

Google has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to block parts of an injunction that would force sweeping changes to its Play Store, as it prepares to appeal its antitrust loss to “Fortnite” maker Epic Games.

In a filing submitted late Wednesday, Google argued that the lower court order is “unprecedented” and would cause reputational harm, safety and security risks, while putting it at a competitive disadvantage.

Epic sued Google in 2020, claiming it monopolized app distribution and in-app payments on Android devices in violation of U.S. antitrust law. A jury sided with Epic in 2023, and Judge James Donato issued an injunction requiring Google to:

  • allow rival app stores inside the Play Store,

  • make its app catalog available to competitors, and

  • let developers add external links in apps so users can bypass Google’s billing system.

Google said the changes would affect over 100 million U.S. Android users and 500,000 developers, asking the Supreme Court to decide by October 17 whether to pause the order. The company plans to file its full appeal by October 27, setting up the possibility for the justices to review the case in their new term beginning October 6.

Epic dismissed Google’s arguments, saying it was using “flawed security claims” to maintain control over Android. “The court’s injunction should go into effect as ordered so consumers and developers can benefit from competition, choices and lower prices,” Epic said.

Earlier this year, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the injunction, noting evidence that Google’s conduct had entrenched its dominance. The full 9th Circuit later declined to revisit the case.

Epic CEO Tim Sweeney praised the ruling, saying developers and users would benefit from more openness in the Android ecosystem.

Meanwhile, Google continues to face other lawsuits from regulators, consumers, and businesses over its search and advertising practices, further intensifying its antitrust battles.

Australian Court Partly Rules Against Apple and Google in Epic Games Antitrust Case

An Australian federal court has ruled that Apple’s App Store and Google’s Android app marketplace engage in uncompetitive practices, handing Epic Games a partial victory in its long-running legal battle against the tech giants.

The 2,000-page judgment, not yet publicly released, found that Apple and Google’s app stores lacked safeguards against anti-competitive behavior. However, the court also determined that the companies had not intentionally violated the law, local media reported.

Epic Games argued that both Apple and Google charged excessive fees for app downloads and in-app purchases while blocking users from installing alternative app stores. In response to the ruling, Epic said on X that the decision confirmed the companies “abuse their control over app distribution and in-app payments to limit competition.” The company also announced that Fortnite and the Epic Games Store would soon be available on iOS devices in Australia, calling it a win for both developers and consumers.

Apple welcomed the court’s dismissal of some of Epic’s claims but expressed strong disagreement with the findings on competition, maintaining that it faces “fierce competition in every market where we operate.” Google similarly said it would review the full judgment but disagreed with the court’s characterization of its billing practices and certain historical partnerships.

The ruling adds to Epic Games’ global campaign challenging the dominance of app distribution systems controlled by Apple and Google, which has included high-profile cases in the United States and Europe.