Yazılar

Singapore Threatens Meta With Fines Over Facebook Impersonation Scams

The Singapore government has given Meta Platforms until the end of this month to introduce stronger safeguards, including facial recognition technology, to combat impersonation scams on Facebook—or face steep fines.

The Ministry of Home Affairs said on Thursday that Meta could be fined up to S$1 million ($776,639) if it fails to comply “without reasonable excuse.” After the deadline, Meta would face additional penalties of S$100,000 per day until measures are implemented.

The directive, issued Wednesday, follows a surge in scams involving fake ads, accounts, and business pages impersonating government officials. Authorities say incidents of such scams rose sharply between June 2024 and June 2025.

A Meta spokesperson said impersonation and deceptive ads are against company policy, adding: “We remove these when detected.” The spokesperson noted that Meta uses specialized systems to catch fraudulent accounts and “celeb-bait” ads, and works with law enforcement to pursue legal action against scammers.

Earlier this month, Singapore police ordered Meta to step up anti-scam measures on Facebook, but that directive did not include a compliance deadline.

Officials said this is the first enforcement order under Singapore’s Online Criminal Harms Act, which came into effect in February 2024. The law gives regulators new powers to hold platforms accountable for online scams and harmful digital activity.

“While Meta has taken steps to address impersonation scams globally, including in Singapore, the Ministry of Home Affairs and police remain concerned by the prevalence of such scams locally,” the ministry said.

Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg Considered Instagram Spinoff Amid Ongoing Antitrust Scrutiny, Documents Reveal

In 2018, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg seriously considered spinning off Instagram, fearing increasing antitrust scrutiny, according to a document presented during a trial in Washington. The document was revealed on the second day of Zuckerberg’s testimony in a high-profile case where the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is attempting to reverse Meta’s acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp. This legal battle aims to undo the mergers, which the FTC claims reduced competition in the social media market.

The memo, shown during the trial, revealed Zuckerberg’s candid thoughts on the matter. In it, he mused, “I wonder if we should consider the extreme step of spinning Instagram out as a separate company.” At the time, Meta was contemplating a major reorganization, aiming to better integrate its social media platforms. However, Zuckerberg also acknowledged that consolidating the apps could foster “strong business growth,” even though it could risk undermining Facebook’s flagship app and its broader family of services.

Despite these concerns, Meta ultimately decided against spinning off Instagram, choosing instead to push forward with its integration plans the following year. The decision not to break off Instagram underscores Zuckerberg’s assessment of the antitrust risks at play. The document reflects his awareness of the potential legal and regulatory challenges Meta might face, with antitrust pressure mounting in the tech industry.

Zuckerberg’s memo also highlighted a broader concern about the future of big tech. He expressed that, with rising calls to dismantle large tech corporations, it was likely that Meta could face forced separations in the future. Specifically, he noted that a shift in U.S. leadership, particularly under a “next Democratic president,” could lead to actions to break up major tech companies, including Meta’s prized acquisitions like Instagram and WhatsApp.

Mark Zuckerberg Defends Meta Against US Antitrust Allegations During Trial Testimony

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg testified on Monday in a closely watched antitrust trial in Washington, defending the company against claims that it acquired Instagram and WhatsApp to stifle competition. US regulators argue that Meta’s multibillion-dollar deals were strategically aimed at neutralizing emerging threats to Facebook’s dominance in the social media landscape.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is seeking a major structural remedy that could force Meta to divest Instagram and WhatsApp. This case, viewed as a major test of the US government’s willingness to challenge Big Tech, comes at a critical time when Meta’s revenue heavily depends on platforms like Instagram, which reportedly contributes to nearly half of the company’s US advertising income.

During his testimony, Zuckerberg, dressed in a dark suit and light blue tie, maintained a calm demeanor as he refuted claims that the acquisitions were motivated solely by a desire to crush competition. He insisted that connecting friends and family was only one part of Meta’s broader vision for its apps. Zuckerberg highlighted that Facebook’s strategy also emphasized helping users discover public content, beyond just personal sharing.

Zuckerberg also addressed a pivotal 2018 decision when Facebook shifted its focus back to content shared by friends, a move that failed to keep pace with how users were increasingly sharing through private messages rather than public posts. Meanwhile, the FTC presented internal communications suggesting Zuckerberg had viewed acquiring Instagram and WhatsApp as strategic moves to preempt future rivals, particularly with the rising competition from newer platforms like TikTok.