India Rebukes X Over “Tom, Dick, and Harry” Remark in Ongoing Court Battle on Content Takedowns
A legal clash between Elon Musk’s X (formerly Twitter) and the Indian government intensified on Tuesday after X’s lawyer made a controversial remark suggesting that “every Tom, Dick, and Harry” government official could issue takedown orders on online content. The statement drew a sharp and immediate rebuke from India’s Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, escalating a long-standing standoff over digital content regulation.
The remark came during a hearing at the Karnataka High Court, where X is challenging a government-run website that it alleges serves as a “censorship portal.” The Indian government, however, defends the portal as a tool for swiftly notifying social media platforms of legal obligations under content moderation laws.
X’s lawyer, K.G. Raghavan, cited a recent example where the Indian Railways ordered the takedown of a video showing a car being driven on a railway track—content X considered newsworthy. “This is the danger… if every Tom, Dick, and Harry officer is authorised,” he argued.
Solicitor General Mehta strongly objected, stating, “Officers are not Tom, Dick, or Harry… they are statutory functionaries.” He further defended India’s regulatory approach, saying, “No social media intermediary can expect completely unregulated functioning.”
The Indian Information Technology Ministry and X did not issue public responses to Reuters’ inquiries following the courtroom exchange.
India has become a strategically important market for Musk’s expanding empire, particularly with upcoming plans to launch Starlink and Tesla in the country. However, X’s friction with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s administration over content moderation continues to cast a shadow over those ambitions.
The roots of the conflict trace back to 2021, when X refused to comply with Indian orders to block specific tweets. Although it eventually yielded to the demands, the platform has continued to contest the legality of those directives in Indian courts.
Tuesday’s court exchange underscores the ongoing tension between tech giants and sovereign governments over who has the final say in regulating online content—and how far that power should extend.