Yazılar

French Lawmaker Seeks Criminal Probe Into TikTok Over Youth Safety

A French parliamentary committee examining the psychological impact of TikTok on minors has concluded that the platform endangers the health and lives of young users. On Thursday, committee chair Arthur Delaporte announced he had formally asked the Paris public prosecutor to open a criminal investigation into TikTok.

Allegations Against TikTok

Delaporte, a Socialist lawmaker, accused TikTok of:

  • Deliberately endangering minors’ health and lives.

  • Possible active complicity in exposing children to harmful content.

  • Perjury, alleging TikTok executives misled lawmakers during hearings.

“It seems to me that there are offences of a criminal nature,” Delaporte told franceinfo.

TikTok’s Response

A TikTok spokesperson rejected the findings, calling them “misleading” and saying lawmakers were unfairly making the company a scapegoat. TikTok insisted it enforces strict policies to protect teenagers and their families, including dedicated safety features.

Background

  • The committee was formed in March 2024 following a lawsuit by seven families, who claimed TikTok exposed their children to content encouraging suicide.

  • The final report recommended:

    • Ban on social media use for children under 15.

    • Nighttime curfew (10 p.m. to 8 a.m.) for users aged 15–18.

Wider Scrutiny

TikTok, like other platforms, faces global pressure over child safety. Several countries in Europe, as well as Australia, are weighing restrictions on underage social media use.

French President Emmanuel Macron in June voiced support for an EU-wide ban on social media for under-15s, citing youth safety concerns after a fatal school stabbing.

The decision now rests with the Paris prosecutor, who will determine whether to pursue a formal criminal probe.

FDA to Review AI-Powered Mental Health Devices in November Advisory Panel

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced it will convene its Digital Health Advisory Committee (DHAC) on November 6 to evaluate the growing category of AI-enabled digital mental health tools.

The meeting will explore how technologies such as chatbots, virtual therapists, and digital therapeutics could help bridge the nation’s mental health care gap, while also assessing the risks of safety, efficacy, and oversight.

Why It Matters

The U.S. faces a shortage of mental health professionals, and AI-driven platforms promise scalability, accessibility, and rapid intervention. But the speed of innovation has left regulators searching for frameworks to ensure these devices are trustworthy and clinically sound.

FDA’s Approach

  • The DHAC will advise the agency on regulatory pathways for AI/ML tools, remote monitoring, digital therapeutics, and medical device software.

  • The panel discussion is expected to help the FDA identify key areas of concern such as data privacy, bias in algorithms, and standards for clinical validation.

  • The FDA has already begun experimenting with AI in its review processes, reflecting its broader shift toward digital oversight.

Next Steps

  • The FDA has opened a public docket for comments ahead of the session.

  • Supporting materials will be made available at least two business days before the meeting.

The November discussion could shape how future AI mental health devices are classified, monitored, and approved in the U.S., setting an early precedent for regulation in this rapidly expanding sector.

Australia’s Teen Social Media Ban Faces a New Wildcard: Teenagers

Australia is preparing to implement the world’s first national social media ban for users under 16, but new challenges have emerged from the very group the law aims to protect: teenagers themselves.

Thirteen-year-old Jasmine Elkin from Perth recently tested five different photo-based age verification software products, alongside about 30 other students. While impressed by some systems’ ability to estimate age to the exact month, Elkin doubts the ban’s effectiveness, noting that young users could easily bypass it by asking older siblings to take verification photos.

This concern reflects a broader worry shared by child protection advocates, tech companies, and trial organizers: the technology works, but young people are highly skilled at finding workarounds.

Starting in December, major social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok will face fines up to A$49.5 million ($32.17 million) if they fail to take “reasonable steps” to prevent users under 16 from accessing their services. Currently, these platforms require users to be at least 13 to create accounts.

How well Australia’s ban succeeds may influence other countries. Britain, France, and Singapore are pursuing similar restrictions, and several U.S. states, including Florida, are challenging free speech laws to impose age limits. Elon Musk, owner of X (formerly Twitter), has criticized the Australian law and regulatory authority, calling it a “censorship commissar.”

Trial organizers say nearly 60 products were considered, with about a dozen tested by teenagers in May. The teenagers demonstrated fast tech skills, leading organizers to increase the number of products tested and shorten testing times. The software mainly used selfies to estimate age, as other methods—such as credit card checks—were impractical for teens, and hand-gesture recognition gave imprecise age estimates near the 16-year cutoff.

The trial’s detailed results will be presented on June 20, with a full report to the government expected by the end of July. This will inform the eSafety Commissioner’s recommendations. The government has cited risks from cyberbullying, harmful body image content, and misogyny as reasons for the law.

Despite the technology’s promise, uncertainties remain about how effective it needs to be and whether it can keep pace with teenagers’ ingenuity. Some trial participants said they would find ways around blocks, while others accepted it as a step toward safer online environments.

Communications Minister Anika Wells’s spokesperson emphasized that age restrictions are “not the end-all be-all” but a positive move to protect young people online.