Yazılar

Democratic AGs Urge Court to Reconsider DOJ Settlement in $14B HPE-Juniper Deal

/in /tarafından

A coalition of 20 Democratic attorneys general, led by Colorado’s Phil Weiser, is urging a federal court to scrutinize and potentially reject the U.S. Department of Justice’s settlement that cleared Hewlett-Packard Enterprise’s $14 billion acquisition of Juniper Networks.

In a letter filed Friday, the AGs argued the court must examine whether the DOJ’s decision was tainted by “undue influence” from politically connected lobbyists. “If… the evidence establishes that it was the product of undue influence, then the court should reject it as against the public interest,” Weiser wrote.

The DOJ initially sued to block the merger in January, shortly after Trump took office, citing antitrust concerns that the deal would leave HPE and Cisco controlling over 70% of the U.S. networking equipment market. But just before trial in June, the DOJ reversed course, dropping its case in exchange for HPE agreeing to license Juniper’s AI technology and divest a unit serving small and mid-sized businesses.

That reversal has fueled controversy. Two DOJ antitrust officials who approved the settlement were later fired, in what sources described as retaliation against division head Gail Slater for resisting political pressure to settle. Former DOJ official Roger Alford, one of those dismissed, later accused leadership of having “perverted justice” to favor HPE.

The AGs want the court to hear testimony from Alford and other DOJ staff, as well as consultants tied to HPE, before finalizing approval. The push sets up another flashpoint in the broader debate over antitrust enforcement and political interference in major tech-sector mergers.

U.S. DOJ Probes Google Over Licensing Deal with Character.AI

/in /tarafından

The U.S. Department of Justice is investigating whether Google’s licensing deal with AI startup Character.AI violated antitrust laws, according to a report by Bloomberg Law. The probe focuses on whether the deal was deliberately structured to sidestep formal merger review processes.

Key Points:

  • Nature of the Deal: In 2023, Google secured a non-exclusive license to Character.AI’s large language model (LLM) technology and subsequently hired the company’s co-founders, Noam Shazeer and Daniel De Freitas—both former Google engineers.

  • Regulatory Concern: Antitrust officials are questioning if this agreement—despite not involving an acquisition—effectively gave Google undue influence or control over Character.AI’s technology, potentially undermining market competition in the fast-growing generative AI sector.

  • Google’s Response: A spokesperson stated that Google has no ownership stake in Character.AI and that the company remains independent. “We’re always happy to answer any questions from regulators,” the spokesperson said.

  • Ongoing Scrutiny: The probe is at an early stage and may not result in formal action, but it signals heightened regulatory vigilance over AI partnerships. The DOJ can still act if the deal is deemed anti-competitive, even without triggering a formal merger review.

  • Industry Trend: Similar AI talent and technology acquisition strategies have been employed by:

    • Microsoft, which paid $650 million to license Inflection AI’s models and onboard its team.

    • Amazon, which hired Adept’s co-founders and staff in 2023.
      Both deals have also drawn regulatory interest.

  • Broader Context: Google is already facing two major antitrust lawsuits from the DOJ targeting its dominance in search and digital advertising. Earlier this month, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) supported a proposal requiring Google to share its search data with rivals.

Strategic Implications:

The inquiry reflects regulators’ growing concern that Big Tech may be circumventing antitrust oversight through creative structuring of AI-related partnerships. As companies compete to lead in generative AI, expect increased scrutiny on licensing, hiring, and technology transfer deals that could entrench market power.