Yazılar

Brazil Challenges Meta’s Hate Speech Policy Changes as Non-Compliant with Local Law

Brazil’s government expressed “serious concern” on Tuesday over Meta Platforms’ recent changes to its hate speech policy, stating that the modifications do not align with the country’s legal framework. The announcement comes after Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram, and Threads, reduced restrictions on discussions surrounding sensitive issues such as immigration and gender identity and ended its fact-checking program in the United States.

President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva had previously criticized Meta’s policy adjustments, calling them “extremely serious.” The Brazilian government has now demanded clarification from the social media giant on its plans. Facebook remains highly influential in Brazil, with approximately 100 million active users, making it one of Meta’s largest markets.

The government did not specify which aspects of Meta’s new policy might violate Brazilian law but warned that the changes could “create fertile ground” for legal breaches, particularly those protecting fundamental rights. Brazil’s legislation prohibits hate speech, including racial slurs and attacks on religious beliefs.

In response, Meta clarified in a letter to the Brazilian government that the recent changes to its fact-checking program were currently limited to the U.S. The company also stated that updates to its community standards primarily affected hate speech policies and were intended to promote greater freedom of expression.

However, Brazil’s Solicitor General’s Office (AGU) criticized Meta’s response, saying that the changes did not adequately comply with Brazil’s legislation or ensure the protection of citizens’ rights. The AGU emphasized that aspects of Meta’s revised hate speech policy, applicable to Brazil, raised “serious concerns.”

Brazil plans to hold a public hearing this week to discuss the implications of Meta’s policy changes with experts. The case recalls a similar instance last year when the Brazilian Supreme Court suspended X’s (formerly Twitter) operations for over a month due to non-compliance with court orders related to hate speech moderation. X’s owner, Elon Musk, initially condemned the court’s actions as censorship but ultimately complied with demands to reinstate operations in the country.

Brazil’s move highlights its commitment to regulating social media platforms and enforcing local laws to protect citizens from harmful content.

 

EU Assesses Big Tech Cases Ahead of Trump’s Arrival

The European Commission affirmed on Tuesday that it is proceeding with its investigations into U.S. Big Tech companies, including Apple, Alphabet, X, and Meta, and stressed that President-elect Donald Trump’s return to the White House would not alter its commitment to enforcing European laws. The EU has been at the forefront of examining whether these companies have violated laws designed to prevent them from gaining an unfair advantage over competitors.

Trump, who will begin his second term on Monday, has been critical of several European policies, while his ally Elon Musk has clashed with EU regulators on multiple occasions. Reports surfaced on Tuesday suggesting that Brussels might reassess its ongoing investigations of Big Tech, potentially scaling back or altering the scope of the probes at the request of U.S. companies seeking Trump’s intervention.

However, Henna Virkkunen, the EU commissioner responsible for policy, reassured Reuters that investigations are proceeding as usual and no decisions have been made to suspend them. A spokesperson for the European Commission emphasized that the assessments were routine and unrelated to Trump’s upcoming presidency. The focus of these assessments is on evaluating the progress of cases, the allocation of resources, and the overall readiness of investigations.

U.S. tech companies have long complained that European regulations stifle innovation and impose hefty fines. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently urged Trump to intervene and prevent further fines from the EU. He likened the EU’s competition enforcement to a “tariff” on U.S. firms. The Digital Markets Act (DMA), Digital Services Act (DSA), and the EU AI Act have drawn particular criticism from tech industry leaders, including Musk, who was scrutinized earlier this month after hosting controversial figures on his X platform.

The EU’s investigations, which can take several years, have already resulted in significant penalties. Last November, Meta was fined nearly 800 million euros ($821 million) for anti-competitive practices. Ongoing investigations into X, Apple, and Alphabet have yet to reach a conclusion.

In the face of criticism, Thierry Breton, the former EU industry chief, urged that the Commission resist efforts to weaken its regulations, asserting that regulation is not censorship.

 

Meta to Lay Off 5% of ‘Lowest Performers’, Plans to Rehire for Impacted Roles

Meta Platforms announced that it will lay off approximately 5% of its workforce, targeting its “lowest performers.” The company, which employed more than 72,000 individuals as of September 30, will seek to fill the positions of those affected later this year. The decision is part of Meta’s ongoing efforts to “raise the bar” on performance management, according to a spokesperson for CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

Zuckerberg has previously indicated that more job cuts could be on the horizon in the coming months, as the company works to streamline operations and improve efficiency. This is in line with Meta’s broader shift toward prioritizing artificial intelligence (AI) investments, with billions being funneled into AI infrastructure to stay competitive in the rapidly evolving tech landscape. Many other tech firms, including Cisco and IBM, have made similar moves to redirect investments into AI.

The announcement follows significant restructuring efforts in 2022, which led to the loss of around 11,000 jobs. Meta’s “Year of Efficiency” in 2023 saw the company eliminate an additional 10,000 roles as part of cost-cutting initiatives.

In a related move, Meta also made headlines last week by canceling its U.S. fact-checking program and relaxing restrictions on certain controversial topics. This was seen as a response to pressure from conservative groups ahead of Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidential race.