Yazılar

EU’s Top Court Adviser Supports Italy in Meta Platforms Copyright Dispute

An adviser to the European Union’s highest court stated on Thursday that EU member states have the right to implement their own measures to strengthen the position of news publishers in negotiations with large online platforms, provided these do not infringe on freedom of contract.

The dispute under review by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) involves Meta Platforms, owner of Facebook, and Italy’s communications regulator AGCOM. The case centers on a fee that Meta must pay Italian publishers for using snippets of their news articles.

Meta challenged whether national measures like Italy’s are compatible with rights granted to publishers under EU copyright law. However, CJEU Advocate General Maciej Szpunar argued that EU copyright rules aim not only to protect publishers from unpaid use of their content but also to ensure they receive a fair share of revenue generated by platforms.

Szpunar emphasized the public interest behind these rules, describing them as efforts to support the economic viability of the press, which he called “a key pillar of democracy.”

Meta said it will await the court’s final ruling but expressed concerns that Italy’s implementation of the directive undermines the goal of copyright harmonization in Europe. A Meta spokesperson warned that inconsistent legislation can hinder innovation and create uncertainty.

The adviser also noted that Italy’s regulator must respect contractual freedom. Szpunar said AGCOM’s powers—such as setting remuneration benchmarks, resolving disputes, and monitoring information—are acceptable if they serve only to assist and do not restrict the parties’ freedom to contract.

The CJEU is expected to issue its decision in the coming months, and it often aligns with the advocate-general’s recommendations.

India Forms Expert Panel to Review Copyright Law in Wake of AI Legal Battles

India has convened an eight-member expert panel to review the Copyright Act of 1957 and assess whether it adequately addresses artificial intelligence-related disputes, amid ongoing litigation against OpenAI by major Indian news publishers.

The secret memo, reviewed by Reuters, outlines how the Ministry of Commerce has tasked intellectual property lawyers, government officials, and tech executives to examine legal and policy challenges related to the use of copyrighted content by AI models like ChatGPT.

The move comes in response to a pending high court case in New Delhi filed by prominent media entities such as NDTV, Indian Express, Hindustan Times, and members of the Digital News Publishers Association. The plaintiffs accuse OpenAI of using their content without authorization to train ChatGPT, which they argue constitutes copyright infringement.

OpenAI has denied any wrongdoing, asserting that it uses publicly available data and offers an opt-out mechanism for websites. The company maintains that its practices do not breach Indian copyright law.

The panel’s mandate includes reviewing the scope and interpretation of existing laws, evaluating how global copyright trends intersect with AI, and delivering recommendations for legal updates or clarifications to the government.

India joins a growing list of countries — including the U.S., EU members, and Japan — grappling with how to regulate AI training data in a way that balances innovation, creator rights, and fair use.