Yazılar

Intel CEO Considers Major Shift in Foundry Strategy, Focuses on 14A Chipmaking to Compete with TSMC

Intel’s new CEO Lip-Bu Tan is contemplating a significant change to the company’s contract chip manufacturing business, potentially abandoning the costly 18A process developed under his predecessor to focus on the newer 14A technology. This move aims to better compete with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and attract major clients like Apple and Nvidia, sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.

The 18A process, which Intel invested billions in, is seen as losing appeal among prospective customers. Shifting focus away from it could lead to a substantial financial write-off for Intel, possibly costing hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars. Intel confirmed it would continue producing chips using 18A for its own internal designs, including the “Panther Lake” laptop chips planned for 2025, as well as fulfilling existing contracts with Amazon and Microsoft.

Tan, who took over in March, has quickly moved to cut costs and reshape Intel’s direction amid years of falling behind in chip technology. The 18A process, which features new transistor designs and energy delivery methods, was intended to rival TSMC’s leading-edge technology but is now considered roughly comparable to TSMC’s earlier N3 node.

By emphasizing 14A, Intel hopes to offer a more competitive foundry service and win contracts from major chip designers currently reliant on TSMC’s manufacturing. The company is customizing 14A to client needs and planning a strategic discussion with its board as soon as this month, with a final decision expected in the fall.

Intel’s move reflects the high stakes involved in regaining its manufacturing edge after a difficult period culminating in an $18.8 billion net loss in 2024. Tan has also revamped Intel’s leadership and streamlined management to improve agility.

While the strategy is still forming, the potential pivot marks one of Tan’s boldest efforts to restore Intel’s chipmaking leadership and profitability.

Nvidia Regains Title as Most Valued Company in June on AI Optimism

Nvidia reclaimed its position as the world’s most valuable company by market capitalization in June, reaching $3.86 trillion, driven by renewed investor optimism over its AI leadership and rising demand for its AI chips. This valuation was about 4.3% higher than Microsoft’s $3.69 trillion market cap at the end of June.

Despite this, Nvidia’s value remains below Apple’s record high of approximately $3.92 trillion set in December 2024. Apple ranked third with a market capitalization of $3.1 trillion at the end of June.

Other tech giants also saw significant gains: Meta Platforms rose 14% to $1.86 trillion, Broadcom increased 13.9% to $1.3 trillion, and Amazon grew 7% to $2.33 trillion. Meanwhile, Tesla’s market value dropped 8.3% to $1.02 trillion, affected by CEO Elon Musk’s public conflict with former President Donald Trump.

Daniel Ives, an analyst at Wedbush Securities, forecasted that Nvidia and Microsoft would both surpass $4 trillion market caps this summer, with a focus on reaching the $5 trillion mark over the next 18 months, signaling that the tech bull market is still in its early phase, led by the AI revolution.

Two Chinese AI Chip Firms Target $1.7 Billion IPOs Amid U.S. Export Curbs

Two Chinese artificial intelligence chipmakers, Moore Threads and MetaX, are seeking to raise a combined 12 billion yuan ($1.65 billion) through initial public offerings (IPOs) on Shanghai’s STAR Market, according to filings released Monday. The companies are betting that U.S. export restrictions on advanced semiconductors will drive demand for homegrown alternatives.

Beijing-based Moore Threads aims to raise 8 billion yuan, while Shanghai-based MetaX targets 3.9 billion yuan. Both firms design graphics processing units (GPUs)—vital components for AI applications—and are attempting to position themselves as domestic challengers to Nvidia, whose chips are now largely restricted from sale in China.

Their listing bids come as China accelerates its push for semiconductor self-sufficiency amid tightening U.S. sanctions. In April, Washington imposed additional curbs that banned Nvidia’s popular H20 chips from export to China. Earlier restrictions have also blocked Chinese chipmakers from using top-tier global foundries such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC).

Although both Moore Threads and MetaX acknowledged in their IPO filings that U.S. sanctions present operational challenges, they also highlighted the market opportunity those restrictions have created. “U.S. restrictions… are prompting Chinese companies to accelerate domestic substitution,” Moore Threads stated. Similarly, MetaX noted that geopolitical pressures are “forcing domestic clients to use domestically-produced GPU products.”

Financially, both firms remain deep in the red.

  • Moore Threads reported 2024 revenue of 438 million yuan but posted a loss of 1.49 billion yuan, adding to losses of 1.67 billion yuan in 2023 and 1.84 billion yuan in 2022.

  • MetaX had 2024 revenue of 743 million yuan with a 1.4 billion yuan loss, following losses of 871 million yuan in 2023 and 777 million yuan in 2022.

Despite these losses, analysts say that access to China’s capital markets is critical for these startups to scale R&D and reach economies of scale. “Moore Threads and MetaX are both considered leading GPU firms in China,” said He Hui, semiconductor research director at Omdia. “IPO funding is essential to sustain innovation and growth.”

Founded in 2020, both companies were launched by veterans of major U.S. chipmakers.

  • MetaX’s leadership includes former AMD executives, notably Chairman Chen Weiliang, AMD’s former global head of GPU product line design.

  • Moore Threads was founded by ex-Nvidia personnel, including Chairman Zhang Jianzhong, previously Nvidia’s general manager in China.

These two firms join a rapidly expanding field of Chinese AI chipmakers such as Huawei, Cambricon, and Hygon, all seeking to fill the void left by restricted foreign chip supply and capitalize on Beijing’s semiconductor independence ambitions.