Yazılar

Facebook removes page accused of harassing ICE agents after DOJ request

Meta Platforms has taken down a Facebook page that the U.S. Department of Justice said was being used to harass Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents operating in Chicago, officials confirmed on Tuesday.

In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Attorney General Pam Bondi said the page was part of an effort to “dox and target” roughly 200 ICE officers deployed as part of President Donald Trump’s immigration enforcement campaign. Doxxing refers to the practice of publishing private information about individuals online, often to encourage harassment.

A Meta spokesperson confirmed the page’s removal, saying it violated Facebook’s policies against coordinated harm. The Justice Department did not provide further details, and Reuters was unable to access or review the page before it was taken down.

The takedown follows broader efforts by the Trump administration to clamp down on digital tools tracking ICE operations. Earlier this month, Apple and Google removed apps that allowed users to monitor ICE agent movements, following government pressure and threats of legal action against developers.

ICE has played a central role in Trump’s hardline immigration policy, carrying out frequent raids and arrests that have drawn criticism from human rights advocates. The administration, however, has accused left-wing activists of harassing and obstructing federal officers.

The decision also comes amid Meta’s attempts to repair its relationship with the Trump administration, following past clashes over content moderation and account suspensions. The company recently contributed $1 million to Trump’s inaugural fund and settled a lawsuit over his banned accounts for $25 million.

Apple Pulls ICE-Tracking Apps After Trump Administration Pressure, Sparking Free Speech Debate

Apple has removed ICEBlock and several similar apps from its App Store following direct contact from President Donald Trump’s administration, marking a rare case of U.S. federal intervention in app moderation. The apps, which alert users to the presence of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, were accused by the Justice Department of potentially endangering law enforcement officers.

Alphabet’s Google also removed related apps on Thursday, citing policy violations, but said it had not been contacted by federal authorities before taking action.

In an emailed statement, Apple confirmed: “Based on information we’ve received from law enforcement about the safety risks associated with ICEBlock, we have removed it and similar apps from the App Store.” The Justice Department later verified that it had formally reached out to Apple, which complied with the request.

Attorney General Pam Bondi praised the removal, calling ICEBlock “a tool designed to put ICE agents at risk just for doing their jobs.” She added, “Violence against law enforcement is an intolerable red line that cannot be crossed.”

Joshua Aaron, the Texas-based developer of ICEBlock, denied those allegations, accusing Apple of “capitulating to an authoritarian regime.” He told Reuters his legal team is considering next steps, arguing that “civilian surveillance of federal agents is a matter of public interest and protected speech.”

Civil liberties experts note that courts have long upheld the right to record and track law enforcement activities in public spaces, as long as those efforts do not obstruct official duties. Six legal scholars told Reuters that surveillance of ICE operations is “largely protected under the U.S. Constitution.”

The crackdown comes amid renewed immigration raids and the expansion of ICE’s enforcement powers under Trump’s second term, backed by $75 billion in funding through 2029. The administration has also targeted visa holders and lawful residents over political activism, particularly pro-Palestinian advocacy, heightening tensions around civil monitoring of ICE activity.

The removal has drawn attention to Apple’s growing compliance with government takedown requests. In 2024 alone, Apple removed over 1,700 apps globally following such demands — most originating from China (1,300+), Russia (171), and South Korea (79). Until now, the United States had not appeared on that list, according to Apple’s transparency reports.

Critics argue the move sets a troubling precedent for state influence over digital speech. “This decision signals a chilling alignment between Big Tech and political power,” said one digital rights advocate. Others suggest Apple’s economic vulnerability—given that most iPhones are manufactured in China and subject to U.S. tariff pressures—may make the company more susceptible to government demands.

Apple removes tens of thousands of apps annually for reasons ranging from fraud to intellectual property violations, but politically motivated removals remain rare. Whether ICEBlock’s disappearance marks a one-time compliance case or a shift in tech–state relations could define the next chapter of America’s digital free speech debate.