Yazılar

Germany’s CDU Considers Social Media Ban for Under-16s

Germany’s conservative Christian Democratic Union is weighing a proposal to bar children under 16 from social media, though coalition partners have signaled reluctance toward a blanket ban. The debate follows similar moves abroad after Australia introduced age-based restrictions, intensifying scrutiny of social media’s effects on young users across Europe.

Dennis Radtke, head of the CDU’s labour wing, said rapid changes in social media have outpaced media literacy, arguing that platforms amplify hate and misinformation. He welcomed the idea of adopting a minimum age, citing the need to protect children. By contrast, the Social Democrats (Social Democratic Party of Germany), the CDU’s centre-left coalition partners, cautioned against an outright prohibition, calling instead for stronger platform-led safeguards, age verification, and limits on aggressive recommendation algorithms for minors.

The issue is set to feature at the CDU’s national conference later this month, following a motion from the party’s Schleswig-Holstein branch proposing a statutory minimum age of 16 with mandatory age checks. The motion reportedly names platforms including TikTok and Meta Platforms’ Instagram and Facebook.

Germany has intensified its focus on online harms, appointing a special commission last year to assess protections for young people. Regulators say issues such as cyberbullying and hate speech are taken seriously, adding that if voluntary measures fail, stricter interventions—including bans—could be considered as a last resort.

California’s Newsom accuses TikTok of suppressing Trump criticism

California Governor Gavin Newsom has accused TikTok of suppressing content critical of President Donald Trump, launching a review to determine whether the platform’s moderation practices violate California law. Newsom’s office said it had received and independently confirmed reports that posts criticizing Trump were being limited following recent structural changes at TikTok.

The allegations emerged shortly after TikTok’s Chinese owner, ByteDance, finalized a deal to create a majority U.S.-owned joint venture designed to secure American user data and avoid a nationwide ban. The arrangement, which was praised by Trump, places U.S. and global investors in control of more than 80% of the venture, with ByteDance retaining a minority stake.

TikTok rejected the accusations, saying the issues stemmed from a technical failure caused by a data center power outage that led to broader system disruptions. The company said the outage resulted in bugs, slower performance and delayed posting for some users, and denied any intentional suppression of political content.

The dispute adds to long-standing political tensions surrounding TikTok in the United States, where the app has faced years of scrutiny over national security, data privacy and influence concerns. Newsom, a Democrat, and Trump, a Republican, have frequently clashed, underscoring the political sensitivity of the platform’s role in public discourse.

Rift at influential Silicon Valley venture firm shows tech’s divide over ICE shooting

A fatal shooting involving U.S. immigration agents has triggered a sharp political divide inside Silicon Valley, spilling into one of the region’s most influential venture capital firms. Partners at Khosla Ventures publicly distanced themselves from a colleague after comments defending the killing of a U.S. citizen during an immigration enforcement operation drew widespread backlash.

The incident involved the death of 37-year-old Alex Pretti, an intensive-care nurse, during a confrontation with federal agents in Minneapolis. The case has intensified national debate as video evidence appeared to contradict the administration’s account, even as officials defended the agents’ actions. The shooting is one of several involving immigration enforcement this month, heightening scrutiny of federal practices.

Tensions escalated after a senior partner at Khosla Ventures argued on social media that the shooting did not involve an innocent victim. Firm founder Vinod Khosla and other partners swiftly rejected the remarks, emphasizing that humanity should transcend politics. Several prominent technology executives echoed that view, praising Pretti and condemning violence.

The episode reflects a broader fracture within the U.S. tech industry, where long-standing progressive values increasingly clash with a growing faction openly supportive of hardline immigration policies. While some executives have aligned themselves with the Trump administration, others face mounting pressure from employees urging companies to speak out against immigration enforcement actions in U.S. cities.