Yazılar

Samsung Galaxy M36 Surfaces on Geekbench Featuring Exynos 1380 SoC and 6GB RAM

The Samsung Galaxy M36 has recently surfaced on Geekbench, revealing some key details about its internals, including its chipset, RAM configuration, and the version of Android it will run. Although Samsung has not officially confirmed the device yet, the Galaxy M36 is expected to be the successor to the Galaxy M35 5G, which launched in India in July 2024. It is anticipated to feature an Exynos 1380 chipset and offer up to 8GB of RAM, building on the specifications of its predecessor. The Galaxy M35 launched with Android 14-based One UI 6, and it is likely that the M36 will debut with a similar Exynos chipset.

As per the Geekbench listing, the Galaxy M36 carries the model number SM-M366B, which suggests that it will be the global variant of the device. The benchmark shows an octa-core processor with four high-performance cores running at 2.40GHz and four efficiency cores at 2.0GHz, indicating that the Exynos 1380 will be the processor powering this handset. This is the same chip that powered the Galaxy M35, ensuring continuity in performance between the two models.

The Geekbench data also confirms that the Galaxy M36 will come with at least 6GB of RAM and will run Android 15 with One UI 7 on top. When tested, the phone scored 1,004 in the single-core and 2,886 in the multi-core tests, reflecting solid performance levels. These scores are comparable to what we’ve seen in the Galaxy M35, indicating that the new M36 might feature similar capabilities to its predecessor. Given that the Galaxy M35 shared specifications with the Galaxy A35 5G, there is a possibility that the Galaxy M36 might also share some similarities with the Galaxy A36 5G, which launched in India earlier this year.

The Samsung Galaxy A36 5G, which offers a 6.7-inch full-HD+ Super AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate and Corning Gorilla Victus+ Glass protection, could serve as a benchmark for the M36’s display and design. The A36 5G also includes a robust camera setup, featuring a 50-megapixel primary sensor with OIS, an 8-megapixel ultrawide sensor, and a 5-megapixel macro camera, in addition to a 12-megapixel front-facing camera. With an IP67-rated water and dust resistance and a powerful 5,000mAh battery supporting 45W fast charging, the M36 could follow a similar feature set.

DOJ Claims Google May Use AI to Strengthen Search Dominance as Trial Kicks Off

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has raised concerns that Alphabet’s Google could further solidify its monopoly in the online search market by leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) products. As the landmark antitrust trial kicked off on Monday, DOJ attorneys argued that Google must be subjected to strict measures to prevent it from using AI as a tool to extend its dominance. The case, which could have far-reaching implications, seeks to reshape the digital landscape by challenging Google’s grip on internet search, potentially shifting the balance of power in the online information realm.

The DOJ is asking the court to mandate significant actions, including requiring Google to divest its Chrome browser. The agency argues that such actions are necessary to break up Google’s monopolistic control over the search industry. In drawing comparisons to past antitrust cases, such as the breakup of AT&T and Standard Oil, DOJ attorney David Dahlquist emphasized that now is the time to send a clear message to Google and other monopolistic entities. According to Dahlquist, these companies need to understand that violating antitrust laws comes with serious consequences, signaling a shift toward stronger enforcement in the digital age.

The government’s case is not just about preserving competition in the current landscape but also about anticipating future challenges. As the online search space continues to evolve, with new technologies like generative AI—exemplified by tools such as ChatGPT—becoming more integrated into the user experience, the DOJ and state attorneys general are pressing for solutions that address both current and future competition concerns. They argue that the court’s remedy should be forward-looking, ensuring that the evolving technological landscape doesn’t become another avenue for Google to entrench its dominance even further.

With these new advancements in AI, the trial could serve as a pivotal moment not just for Google, but for the future of the internet. As the DOJ moves forward with its case, the outcome could set a precedent for how tech giants are regulated in an era where AI and automation are increasingly part of the digital ecosystem. The court’s decision will have lasting implications on how online platforms operate and compete, making this trial one of the most important antitrust cases in recent history.

LG and Samsung Take Legal Action Against Indian Government Over E-Waste Pricing Rules

LG and Samsung Challenge India’s E-Waste Policy in Court Over Pricing Dispute

South Korean electronics giants LG and Samsung have filed legal petitions against the Indian government, seeking to overturn a policy that mandates higher payouts to electronic-waste recyclers. The companies argue that the pricing regulation poses a threat to their business operations in the country. The lawsuits are part of a broader wave of legal challenges from major players in the industry who say the new rules, though environmentally motivated, could create an undue financial burden.

The cases are scheduled to be heard on Tuesday, along with other petitions filed by corporations facing similar concerns. This legal action signals a growing conflict between global manufacturers and the administration of Prime Minister Narendra Modi over India’s tightening environmental standards. While the government aims to bring structure and accountability to its waste management systems, companies fear rising compliance costs and supply chain disruptions.

India is currently the world’s third-largest generator of e-waste, following China and the United States. However, only about 43 percent of the country’s e-waste was formally recycled last year, according to government data. The sector remains largely unregulated, with informal scrap dealers handling roughly 80 percent of the processing. In response, the government introduced a policy to establish a minimum floor price to encourage formalization and investment in the recycling industry.

Despite earlier lobbying efforts, LG and Samsung now join other firms such as Daikin, Havells, and Voltas in taking legal action. The government maintains that the pricing mandate is essential for building a sustainable and efficient e-waste ecosystem, but the companies remain firm in their stance that the regulation is impractical and damaging to business. As the legal battle unfolds, the outcome could shape the future of India’s e-waste policy and its relationship with foreign manufacturers.