Yazılar

EU Faces Mounting Pressure to Delay Enforcement of AI Act as Deadline Nears

With key provisions of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) set to begin on August 2, major tech companies and political figures are urging the European Commission to delay enforcement. Critics say the current framework lacks sufficient guidance, placing a heavy burden on businesses—especially startups—without clear rules on how to comply.

What Happens on August 2?

Although the AI Act was passed in 2024, its rules are being phased in gradually. On August 2, some of the first obligations come into force—specifically for General Purpose AI (GPAI) models such as those developed by Google, OpenAI, Mistral, and others.

These initial provisions require AI developers to:

  • Draw up technical documentation

  • Disclose training data summaries

  • Comply with EU copyright laws

  • Conduct testing for bias, toxicity, and robustness

More rigorous rules apply to high-impact and systemic-risk models, which will need:

  • Adversarial testing

  • Incident reporting

  • Risk assessments

  • Energy efficiency disclosures

However, full enforcement—particularly penalties and oversight powers—doesn’t begin until August 2, 2026.

Why Are Companies Pushing for a Delay?

Tech companies argue that they lack clarity on how to comply with the law. A promised AI Code of Practice, meant to serve as the act’s compliance manual, was due on May 2 but has not been published. The European AI Board is now discussing pushing the guidance release to late 2025.

In an open letter, 45 European AI firms called for a two-year “clock-stop”—a suspension of the countdown to enforcement—until key standards are finalized. They also asked for simpler regulations, warning that unclear requirements could damage European innovation.

Lobbying group CCIA Europe, which represents companies like Google and Meta, said:

“A bold ‘stop-the-clock’ intervention is urgently needed to give AI developers and deployers legal certainty.”

Will the EU Postpone It?

Officially, the European Commission has not signaled a postponement. It insists that the August 2 start date for GPAI obligations stands, although the lack of finalized guidance suggests informal delays in compliance expectations.

Some political figures—including Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson—have also expressed concern, calling the act “confusing” and backing the idea of a pause.

What Comes Next?

Even if the AI Act’s initial deadlines hold, enforcement might be soft or flexible in the early stages due to the lack of practical tools. The AI Code of Practice remains the critical next step for clarity.

Meanwhile, the tension highlights a broader EU challenge: balancing innovation with regulation, especially in fast-moving fields like artificial intelligence.

OpenAI Weighs Antitrust Action Against Microsoft Amid Tensions Over AI Partnership

Executives at OpenAI have internally discussed whether to accuse Microsoft of anticompetitive behavior, potentially seeking a federal regulatory review of their contractual relationship, according to a report from the Wall Street Journal.

Microsoft, a major backer of OpenAI since 2019 with an investment exceeding $10 billion over time, has been a core infrastructure partner via its Azure cloud services. However, tensions between the companies appear to be growing as they negotiate the terms of OpenAI’s ongoing transition into a public-benefit corporation — a step that requires Microsoft’s approval.

Disputes and Strategic Divergences:

  • Talks between the two sides have dragged on for months without a final agreement on Microsoft’s future equity stake in OpenAI.

  • According to The Information, OpenAI is pushing for Microsoft to accept a 33% stake in a restructured subsidiary in exchange for giving up rights to future profits.

  • OpenAI also seeks to revise clauses that currently give Microsoft exclusive hosting rights for its models, potentially opening the door for other cloud providers like Google Cloud, which OpenAI has already begun engaging to expand its compute capacity.

Microsoft, reportedly unwilling to concede to OpenAI’s proposed restructuring, is said to be seeking further concessions. Still, both companies issued a joint statement to Reuters expressing optimism:

“Talks are ongoing and we are optimistic we will continue to build together for years to come.”

Possible Antitrust Implications:

Should OpenAI move forward with an antitrust complaint or regulatory appeal, it could dramatically reshape one of the most influential alliances in the artificial intelligence landscape. Microsoft’s deep integration with OpenAI — spanning cloud infrastructure, product embedding (like Copilot in Office), and funding — could come under increased regulatory scrutiny, especially in the U.S. and EU, where antitrust enforcement in tech has intensified.

This development highlights OpenAI’s increasing desire to diversify partnerships and assert strategic independence, even from its most powerful corporate backer.

Microsoft Strengthens Data Protection for European Cloud Clients

Microsoft announced on Monday that it will ensure data from its European cloud customers remains within Europe, under the jurisdiction of European law, with operational oversight by local personnel and complete customer control.

This move comes amid growing concerns from European governments and companies over the risk of sensitive data being transferred outside the continent, particularly to the United States. The concerns have intensified calls for stricter data sovereignty, prompting American tech giants like Microsoft to adopt more transparent and compliant data governance policies.

As part of these efforts, Microsoft reaffirmed commitments made in April to strengthen safeguards as it scales its cloud and AI infrastructure in Europe. These include compliance with European legislation aimed at curbing the dominance of major technology platforms.

The company also disclosed that any remote access to systems handling European data by Microsoft engineers will be permitted and actively monitored in real-time by personnel based in Europe. This measure is designed to bolster customer trust and ensure alignment with European data protection standards.

Microsoft’s new sovereign private cloud, which supports these enhanced protections, is currently in preview phase and is expected to become generally available later this year.