Yazılar

Altice France rejects €17 billion takeover bid for SFR from telecom rivals

Altice France, the owner of SFR, has rejected a €17 billion ($19.8 billion) joint offer from French telecom giants Bouygues Telecom, Iliad’s Free, and Orange. The move dampens investor hopes for long-awaited consolidation in Europe’s competitive telecom market.

In a memo to employees, CEO Arthur Dreyfuss confirmed that the proposal, which valued Altice France at around €21 billion, had been “immediately rejected.” The bid’s rejection came after it boosted shares of major telecom firms, with Bouygues hitting a seven-year high before closing 9% higher, while Orange rose 3%. The CAC 40 index also gained 2%, lifted by speculation of industry consolidation.

Despite the rejection, Bouygues, Orange, and Iliad reaffirmed their commitment to the proposal, saying it would benefit “customers, employees, creditors, and shareholders.” Analysts at J.P. Morgan viewed the offer as stronger than expected, estimating SFR’s standalone value at €16 billion but noting potential synergies could lift it beyond €20 billion.

Finance Minister Roland Lescure said the government would be “extremely vigilant” about the deal’s potential effects on prices and service quality. Any merger would need approval from French or EU regulators, given that France has maintained four major mobile operators since 2012.

SFR, the country’s second-largest telecom provider, currently serves over 19 million mobile and 6.1 million fiber customers. Analysts suggest that if consolidation moves forward, it could influence similar restructurings across other European markets.

Verizon’s Warning on Slow Subscriber Growth Triggers Telecom Selloff

Verizon Communications issued a warning about “soft” wireless subscriber growth in the first quarter, citing off-season promotions by competitors that have continued despite the typically slow post-holiday period. The announcement caused Verizon’s shares to plunge more than 7% on Tuesday, sparking a broader selloff in the U.S. telecom sector.

Chief Revenue Officer Frank Boulben, speaking at Deutsche Bank’s Media, Internet & Telecom Conference, noted that Verizon pulled back on customer incentives after an aggressive December quarter, while rivals maintained their promotional strategies, intensifying competition.

AT&T shares fell 5.3% as the company also reported elevated subscriber churn in January, while T-Mobile US saw a 4% decline. Analysts point to a shrinking pool of potential new mobile subscribers in an increasingly saturated market, with broadband giants like Comcast stepping up competition by targeting wireless customers.

Verizon also flagged a “slow start” for phone upgrades in the first quarter, attributing it to economic uncertainty and a lack of major new smartphone features. However, the company reaffirmed its annual target for single-digit growth in phone upgrades and expects a stronger rebound later in the year. Verizon anticipates adding more monthly-bill paying wireless subscribers in 2025 than the 900,000 it gained in 2024, supported by its customizable myPlan offerings.

Minimal Impact from Immigration Crackdown

Verizon and AT&T downplayed concerns about potential customer losses due to tighter U.S. immigration policies. President Donald Trump’s administration has intensified immigration enforcement, raising concerns about a reduced pool of new telecom customers. However, Boulben stated that any impact would be minimal, primarily affecting the low-end prepaid market rather than postpaid contracts that require formal identification.

Limited Threat from Satellite Internet

Both Verizon and AT&T dismissed concerns over competition from satellite internet providers like SpaceX’s Starlink, emphasizing that traditional wireless services remain more reliable and cost-effective. AT&T CFO Pascal Desroches acknowledged the potential of satellite-to-cell connectivity but described it as a limited business opportunity at present.

Meanwhile, T-Mobile has announced plans to launch its satellite-to-cell service with Starlink in July, priced at $15 per month.

Musk’s Victory in India’s Satellite Spectrum Raises Possibility of Price War with Ambani

Elon Musk has gained an important victory in India’s satellite spectrum debate, potentially setting the stage for a pricing war with Mukesh Ambani, Asia’s wealthiest man. Following a decision by the Indian government, the country will allocate spectrum for satellite broadband through administrative means rather than the auction process Ambani’s Reliance Jio had been pushing for. Musk, who had publicly criticized the auction route as “unprecedented,” now has a clearer path to launching Starlink’s satellite internet services in India.

Musk’s SpaceX unit, Starlink, has a vast network of 6,400 active satellites providing low-latency broadband to 4 million customers globally. While Starlink has long expressed interest in entering India’s market, regulatory barriers have slowed progress. On the other hand, Ambani’s Reliance Jio, the largest telecom provider in India, had lobbied for spectrum auctions, seeking a “balanced competitive landscape” that would have demanded heavy investments from foreign players like Starlink.

The Indian government’s recent decision removes one of the hurdles for Starlink, allowing it to apply for necessary permits and potentially launch services soon. This marks the beginning of what could be a new battleground between Musk and Ambani, especially over pricing. Starlink’s entry could disrupt India’s broadband market, which has been dominated by Reliance Jio. After spending $19 billion in airwave auctions, Reliance now faces the risk of losing broadband customers to Starlink, and perhaps even data and voice customers as technology advances, according to sources familiar with the situation.

Globally, spectrum allocation through administrative processes has become the norm, with India following this trend. Starlink has already submitted its application for necessary permits, and industry experts foresee Starlink’s aggressive pricing tactics becoming a key factor in this competition. Tim Farrar, a satellite industry analyst, pointed out that Starlink can offer more competitive prices since it doesn’t need to launch new satellites, while Reliance Jio relies on its partnership with Luxembourg-based SES Astra, which operates just 38 satellites.

This isn’t the first time Musk has aggressively undercut prices in new markets. In Kenya, Starlink priced its services at just $10 per month, compared to the $120 per month it charges in the United States. This move sparked complaints from local provider Safaricom, which argued that satellite operators like Starlink should be required to partner with mobile networks. Similar concerns may arise in India as Starlink enters the broadband market.

In India, Reliance Jio currently offers fiber-based broadband at $10 per month, with free routers for long-term plans. Starlink’s strategy, according to industry insiders, involves initially targeting corporate clients with unlimited internet data plans. Starlink’s technology is also poised to reach remote areas, including the 25,000 Indian villages that still lack internet connectivity, making it an appealing option for underserved regions.

India, with 42 million wired broadband users and 904 million telecom users, is the world’s second-largest telecom market. Internet penetration, though growing, still stands at just over 52% as of early 2024, highlighting the potential for further expansion in both rural and urban areas. Starlink’s ability to deliver high-speed internet to remote areas could prove to be a game-changer, particularly in regions where fiber-optic infrastructure is lacking.

Musk has publicly stated that Starlink could be instrumental in providing internet to underserved parts of India. With plans to launch hundreds of additional satellites to enable “direct to cell” voice and data services in the coming years, Starlink’s ambitions extend beyond traditional broadband.

While some industry experts, like Gareth Owen from Counterpoint, believe the fears surrounding Starlink may be overblown—arguing that terrestrial networks will always be cheaper—the rivalry between Musk and Ambani is intensifying. Musk has even taken to social media to joke about the situation, suggesting he would call Ambani to ask if Starlink could compete fairly in India’s internet market.