Yazılar

Meta’s Llama AI approved for use across U.S. government agencies

The U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) has approved Meta Platforms’ artificial intelligence system, Llama, for use by federal agencies, marking a milestone in the government’s adoption of commercial AI. The move comes as the Trump administration pushes to expand the integration of AI into federal operations.

Josh Gruenbaum, GSA’s procurement lead, confirmed that Llama will now be available as part of the agency’s catalog of authorized AI tools. Agencies can experiment with the model—free to use—with GSA’s assurance that it complies with legal and security requirements.

Llama, Meta’s large language model, can process multiple forms of data, including text, audio, video, and images. The approval gives government workers access to a tool that can assist in areas like accelerating contract reviews, handling IT troubleshooting, and managing vast amounts of information.

The GSA has also approved rival AI products from Amazon Web Services, Microsoft, Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI in recent months. Those firms agreed to offer their paid tools at steep discounts while meeting strict federal security standards.

Gruenbaum emphasized that the deals are not about political influence but about collaboration: “It’s about that recognition of how do we all lock in arms and make this country the best country it could possibly be.”

The approval reflects Washington’s accelerating interest in embedding AI across agencies to streamline operations, improve efficiency, and strengthen the government’s technological footing against global competitors.

Nvidia takes $5B stake in Intel, forging alliance on future AI chips

Nvidia announced a $5 billion investment in Intel, acquiring roughly 4% of the struggling chipmaker and pledging to jointly develop new chips for PCs and data centers. The deal comes just weeks after the U.S. government took an extraordinary 10% stake in Intel to shore up the company amid mounting concerns about its competitiveness.

Intel shares surged 23% on the news, while Nvidia’s stock rose nearly 4%. Nvidia will pay $23.28 per share, slightly below Intel’s prior closing price but above what Washington paid earlier this month. The investment makes Nvidia one of Intel’s largest shareholders and marks a pivotal moment in the U.S. effort to counterbalance Asia’s dominance in chip production.

Under the pact, Intel will supply central processors and advanced packaging for joint products that combine Intel CPUs with Nvidia GPUs, linked by Nvidia’s high-speed proprietary technology. The companies pledged to build “multiple generations” of such products, though Nvidia stopped short of committing to use Intel’s foundries for its own chips—a key issue for Intel’s turnaround.

The partnership could reshape the competitive landscape. Analysts say it poses the most immediate risk to AMD, which competes with Intel in supplying data center CPUs, and a longer-term threat to TSMC, which currently manufactures Nvidia’s flagship processors. Broadcom, whose chip-to-chip interconnect technology underpins many AI systems, may also feel pressure.

“This is a massive game-changer for Intel and effectively resets its position of AI-laggard into a cog in future AI infrastructure,” said Gadjo Sevilla, senior analyst at eMarketer. Some analysts even speculate the deal could be the first step toward an eventual breakup or acquisition of Intel by U.S. chipmakers.

Intel’s new CEO, Lip-Bu Tan, has vowed to streamline operations and build capacity more cautiously, only when demand is clear. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang emphasized the administration was not directly involved in the partnership but noted Washington would welcome the collaboration.

For Intel, the deal adds to a growing cash reserve after a $2 billion investment from SoftBank and $5.7 billion from the U.S. government. For Nvidia, the alliance gives it a foothold in Intel’s deep enterprise and government networks, while cementing its dominance in AI infrastructure.

Trump Administration Explores Potential Stake in Intel Amid Push for Domestic Chip Manufacturing

The Trump administration is reportedly in discussions with Intel (INTC.O) to potentially acquire a stake in the U.S. chipmaker, Bloomberg News reported on Thursday, citing sources familiar with the talks. The move would be another example of President Donald Trump’s interventions in industries considered critical to national security. In the past, Trump has promoted multibillion-dollar government partnerships in semiconductors and rare-earth minerals, including a deal with Nvidia (NVDA.O) and an arrangement with MP Materials.

Intel declined to comment on the report but reaffirmed its commitment to supporting the administration’s efforts to bolster U.S. technology and manufacturing leadership. White House spokesman Kush Desai cautioned that discussions about “hypothetical deals” should be viewed as speculation until officially announced.

Intel shares rose more than 7% during regular trading and added another 2.6% in after-hours trading. The discussions follow a recent meeting between Trump and Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan, occurring just days after Trump publicly called for Tan’s resignation over his investments in Chinese technology firms, some of which have ties to the Chinese military. Details about the size of the stake and pricing are still under negotiation.

Analysts suggest the government stake would likely aim to support Intel’s domestic manufacturing expansion and job creation. Intel has previously warned it may need to exit chip manufacturing without sufficient external customers and has planned to slow construction on new Ohio factories. CEO Lip-Bu Tan, in his role for just over six months, has been tasked with reversing years of setbacks that left Intel behind in the fast-growing AI chip market dominated by Nvidia.

Market experts note that any potential deal could include tariffs designed to encourage major clients like Nvidia, AMD (AMD.O), and Apple (AAPL.O) to utilize Intel Foundry services. While government stakes in companies are not unprecedented, some investors question whether Intel, with stable revenue exceeding $50 billion annually despite a loss in industry leadership, requires direct government investment.