Yazılar

Apple Restores Blood Oxygen Feature on Some U.S. Watches After Regulatory Approval

Apple (AAPL.O) announced on Thursday that it will reintroduce a blood oxygen measurement feature to certain Apple Watch models in the United States via a software update. The update applies to Apple Watch Series 9, Series 10, and Apple Watch Ultra 2 after approval from U.S. authorities. Users will be able to monitor blood oxygen levels on a paired iPhone.

The move resolves a long-running legal dispute with Masimo (MASI.O), which accused Apple of misappropriating its pulse oximetry technology and hiring its employees. In 2023, Masimo won a U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) ruling blocking imports of Apple Watches with the feature, prompting Apple to temporarily remove it and triggering a prolonged appeals process.

Apple said the update allows users to start a session in the Blood Oxygen app on the watch, which collects sensor data for calculation and display on the iPhone. The Series 6 Apple Watch first introduced pulse oximetry in 2020, while Masimo launched its blood oxygen-tracking W1 watch in 2022.

Apple had briefly resumed sales after persuading the Federal Circuit to pause the import ban, but the ban was later reinstated, necessitating the temporary removal of the feature in the U.S. Masimo shares fell 4.5% on Thursday.

Trump-Musk Rift Raises Regulatory Risks for Elon Musk’s Business Empire

Elon Musk’s deteriorating political relationship with former President Donald Trump may expose his vast business empire to heightened regulatory scrutiny across multiple U.S. agencies. As political tensions escalate, the risk that regulators may more aggressively oversee Musk’s various companies has become a growing concern. Below is an overview of the key U.S. regulators with authority over Musk’s enterprises, and the potential challenges ahead:

Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
The FCC oversees the allocation of spectrum critical to SpaceX’s Starlink satellite internet service. In April, the FCC launched a review of its longstanding spectrum sharing rules, potentially affecting SpaceX’s access to expanded frequencies necessary to enhance its coverage. While the review aims to modernize spectrum usage, it may also result in stricter rules or delays for SpaceX, depending on the political climate and regulatory stance.

Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
The FDA regulates clinical trials for Neuralink, Musk’s brain implant company. While Neuralink has secured FDA approval for initial human trials, earlier safety concerns cited by the agency in 2023 remain relevant as trials progress. Any missteps or adverse events in ongoing studies could prompt the FDA to halt or delay the company’s development timeline.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
SpaceX’s Starbase launch facility in Texas falls under the EPA’s jurisdiction for environmental compliance, particularly regarding wastewater discharge and environmental impact assessments under the National Environmental Policy Act. Rocket launches and tests, which have included multiple explosions, may invite further scrutiny, particularly if environmental groups or political adversaries exert pressure on federal agencies.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) technology remains under active investigation by NHTSA, especially regarding its performance under poor visibility conditions. The agency recently requested detailed information on Tesla’s robotaxi service set to launch in Austin, Texas, this month. Any regulatory findings could impact Tesla’s ability to scale its self-driving services.

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
The FAA proposed a $633,000 fine against SpaceX last year for license violations during launches. With ongoing investigations and the potential for future launch failures, the FAA holds significant leverage over SpaceX’s launch schedule and licensing requirements.

Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Musk continues to face legal battles with the SEC, including litigation related to his 2022 acquisition of Twitter (now X). The regulator is also reportedly investigating Neuralink, raising additional legal exposure. Any adverse findings could impact Musk personally as well as his companies’ access to capital markets.

Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
The FTC oversees data privacy and antitrust compliance for social media platforms, including X. The agency is currently investigating whether certain media watchdog groups coordinated advertiser boycotts of X, a situation Musk claims is anti-competitive. The FTC’s broader mandate to protect consumer privacy could result in further investigations, particularly regarding data protection for minors.

Political Climate Raises Stakes
While these agencies have long held authority over Musk’s operations, his prior friendly ties to Trump may have provided a degree of political insulation. The recent breakdown in their relationship removes that buffer, potentially leaving Musk more exposed to adversarial regulatory action depending on future election outcomes and shifting political alliances.

With businesses spanning electric vehicles, space exploration, telecommunications, brain-computer interfaces, and social media, Musk’s cross-sector reach makes him uniquely vulnerable to regulatory actions from multiple federal agencies simultaneously.

Coinbase Urges US Regulators to Clear Path for Banks to Offer Crypto Services

On Tuesday, Coinbase Global renewed its call for U.S. banking regulators to clarify or revise their stance on banks providing cryptocurrency services and forming partnerships with digital asset companies. The move comes amid a broader push by the crypto industry to lobby lawmakers for a regulatory framework that could foster the sector’s growth. Most traditional U.S. banks have been hesitant to engage with digital asset firms, citing the lack of regulatory clarity.

Coinbase’s Chief Policy Officer, Faryar Shirzad, expressed frustration on social media, claiming that U.S. bank regulators have “unilaterally and undemocratically” prohibited banks from offering crypto services. This marks the latest in a series of efforts by the crypto industry to press for more favorable regulations.

The crypto sector has been actively working to influence political outcomes, having donated millions of dollars to support Donald Trump’s bid for the White House, hoping to prioritize cryptocurrency regulation under a potential new administration. Shirzad also reached out directly to top U.S. banking regulators, including the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Federal Reserve, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), urging them to allow banks to engage with crypto businesses. However, the OCC declined to comment, and the Fed and FDIC did not immediately respond to inquiries.

The crypto industry has often accused U.S. regulators of deliberately hindering their access to the traditional financial system. While regulators have denied these accusations, the recent move by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to create a task force focused on developing a regulatory framework for crypto assets signals a potential shift in policy.

Former PayPal executive David Sacks has also been appointed as Trump’s “White House A.I. & Crypto Czar,” further suggesting that digital assets may receive more attention from the government if Trump is reelected. Despite these political shifts, U.S. banks have remained cautious about adopting cryptocurrencies in their services.