Arm to Appeal Court Ruling Upholding Qualcomm’s Victory in Licensing Dispute

Arm announced on Tuesday that it will appeal a U.S. federal court decision that upheld Qualcomm’s jury victory in a long-running dispute over processor licensing rights, marking the latest escalation in a case with major implications for the semiconductor industry.

The dispute centers on central processor units (CPUs) designed by Qualcomm’s subsidiary Nuvia, which Arm claimed were produced using its technology without proper authorization. In 2023, a Delaware federal jury ruled that Qualcomm’s CPUs were properly licensed under an existing agreement with Arm, handing a key win to the U.S. chipmaker.

The jury sided with Qualcomm on two of three counts, while deadlocking on the third, leading Judge Maryellen Noreika to declare a mistrial on that issue. Arm later sought to have the favorable verdicts for Qualcomm overturned or to secure a new trial, but the judge rejected both requests.

“Arm remains confident in its position in its ongoing dispute with Qualcomm and will immediately file an appeal seeking to overturn the judgment,” the British chip designer said in a statement.

Qualcomm welcomed the decision, framing it as a validation of its innovation rights.

“Our right to innovate prevailed in this case, and we hope Arm will return to fair and competitive practices in dealing with the Arm ecosystem,” said Ann Chaplin, Qualcomm’s general counsel.

The ruling underscores tensions between Arm’s new licensing model and major semiconductor firms that depend on its architecture. Arm provides fundamental chip technology used in processors made by Qualcomm, Apple, and MediaTek, which power billions of smartphones and connected devices worldwide.

The appeal sets the stage for a closely watched legal battle that could influence how chipmakers access and use Arm’s core intellectual property in future CPU designs.

Apple, Google, and Meta Must Face Lawsuits Over Casino-Style Gambling Apps

A U.S. federal judge has ruled that Apple, Google, and Meta Platforms must face lawsuits accusing them of promoting and profiting from illegal casino-style gambling apps, rejecting their efforts to dismiss the claims under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

In a decision issued Tuesday, Judge Edward Davila of the U.S. District Court in San Jose, California, denied the companies’ main argument that the federal law shields them from liability for third-party content, saying the lawsuits focus on their active role in processing payments and collecting commissions, not merely hosting apps.

The lawsuits, filed as proposed class actions, allege that Apple’s App Store, Google Play Store, and Meta’s Facebook enabled and profited from apps simulating “Vegas-style” slot machine gambling that have led to user addiction, depression, and even suicidal behavior. The plaintiffs claim the companies brokered and collected 30% commissions — estimated to exceed $2 billion — from in-app purchases.

While some state-level claims were dismissed, Davila allowed most consumer protection claims to proceed, except those filed in California. He stated that the platforms’ activities went beyond publishing and that providing “neutral tools” did not absolve them from responsibility.

“The crux of plaintiffs’ theory is that defendants improperly processed payments for social casino apps,” Davila wrote. “It is beside the point whether that activity turns defendants into bookies or brokers.”

The companies now have the option to appeal immediately to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, with Davila acknowledging the national importance of Section 230 immunity questions.

The ongoing litigation, which began in 2021, consolidates several related cases:

  • In re Apple Inc. App Store Simulated Casino-Style Games Litigation (No. 21-md-02985)

  • In re Google Play Store Simulated Casino-Style Games Litigation (No. 21-md-03001)

  • In re Facebook Simulated Casino-Style Games Litigation (No. 21-02777)

The plaintiffs are seeking unspecified compensatory and triple damages, along with other remedies.

NBCUniversal and YouTube TV Reach Short-Term Deal to Avoid Programming Blackout

Alphabet’s YouTube TV and Comcast-owned NBCUniversal have reached a short-term contract extension, preventing a major programming blackout and keeping popular NBC content available to millions of YouTube TV subscribers while negotiations continue.

The deal, confirmed by both companies on Wednesday, came just hours before NBC programming such as “Sunday Night Football” and “America’s Got Talent” risked being pulled from the platform if the parties failed to renew their agreement by midnight Tuesday.

“We’ve reached a short-term extension with Google to avoid YouTube TV customers losing access to NBCUniversal programming as we continue negotiations,” said a NBCUniversal spokesperson. YouTube confirmed the same in a parallel statement.

At the core of the dispute are carriage fees—the rates YouTube TV pays to carry NBCUniversal’s portfolio of channels to its 10 million subscribers. According to sources cited by Reuters, NBCUniversal is seeking to maintain the same terms it has offered other large distributors, including Amazon’s Prime Video Channels, while also pushing to integrate its streaming service Peacock into YouTube TV’s bundle of offerings.

The standoff reflects the ongoing tension between traditional media giants and digital distributors as viewing habits shift toward streaming. With YouTube now holding the largest share of U.S. TV viewership, surpassing both Netflix and legacy broadcasters like Disney, such negotiations could shape the future economics of television distribution.

The temporary deal ensures continuity for viewers but suggests that a long-term agreement remains uncertain, as both sides seek to protect their positions in a rapidly evolving media landscape.