Yazılar

Trump’s AI plan backs antitrust scrutiny, DOJ official says

U.S. antitrust authorities are closely watching the artificial intelligence industry for anticompetitive practices as part of the Trump administration’s broader push to secure American leadership in AI, a senior Justice Department official said on Thursday.

Speaking at Fordham University, Assistant Attorney General Gail Slater emphasized that protecting competition in the AI sector is key to fostering innovation. “The competitive dynamics of each layer of the AI stack and how they interrelate, with a particular eye towards exclusionary behavior that forecloses access to key inputs and distribution channels, are legitimate areas for antitrust inquiry,” she said.

One major focus will be access to data. Slater noted that a judge in Washington recently ordered Alphabet’s Google (GOOGL.O) to share some search data with rivals, including AI firms, to strengthen competition in online search. Google has said it will appeal the ruling.

Slater added that demand for data could fuel vertical integration—mergers between companies and their suppliers—especially in sensitive areas such as healthcare. “We may also increasingly see the desire to acquire data, or to deprive rivals of data, play a role in driving transactions,” she said.

Open-source AI models are another area of interest. Slater said such models can enhance competition, but stressed that “a truly open-source model must be one that is not unilaterally maintained by a single vendor that exerts unwarranted influence and impose restrictions.”

Concerns about AI competition were also voiced during President Joe Biden’s administration, which scrutinized Big Tech’s partnerships with AI startups. Trump’s AI plan, however, explicitly ties antitrust enforcement to the goal of strengthening U.S. dominance in the sector.

Beijing ends Google probe, shifts focus to Nvidia in U.S. trade talks

China has decided to end its antitrust investigation into Google, signaling a strategic shift as trade negotiations with Washington intensify over TikTok and Nvidia, the Financial Times reported on Thursday.

The move indicates Beijing is redirecting regulatory pressure toward Nvidia as a bargaining tool in the ongoing trade talks, while closing the Google probe as a gesture of flexibility toward the United States.

According to the report, China’s State Administration for Market Regulation, which launched the investigation against Google in February, has dropped the case. The regulator had previously suggested Google might have violated China’s anti-monopoly law but did not provide further details. Google has reportedly not yet been formally notified of the decision.

Earlier this week, Chinese authorities accused Nvidia of breaching anti-monopoly rules following a preliminary review of its business practices. The shift comes amid heightened tensions, with both nations trading tariffs and regulatory measures in recent months. Washington imposed steep tariffs on Chinese goods and threatened to ban TikTok, while Beijing responded with its own tariffs and investigations targeting U.S. tech firms, including Google.

FTC investigates Google and Amazon over ad pricing transparency

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has opened probes into Google and Amazon, examining whether the tech giants misled advertisers about the terms and costs of placing ads on their platforms, according to a source familiar with the matter.

The investigations, led by the FTC’s consumer protection unit, focus on whether the companies properly disclosed pricing structures and auction practices. Regulators are scrutinizing Amazon’s use of “reserve pricing”—a minimum price advertisers must accept before buying an ad—and whether those rules were clearly communicated. Google is being investigated for whether it raised ad costs internally without disclosing the changes to advertisers.

Both companies declined to comment on the probe.

The news comes as the two firms face mounting legal challenges. On September 22, trials are set to begin in separate federal cases:

  • The FTC vs. Amazon in Seattle, alleging the company enrolled consumers into Prime without consent and made cancellations excessively difficult.

  • The DOJ vs. Google in Virginia, where regulators are seeking the breakup of its advertising technology business, after a judge ruled the company illegally monopolized digital ads.

The FTC is also pursuing a broader case accusing Amazon of holding illegal monopolies in online marketplaces.

With the U.S. already pursuing multiple landmark antitrust and consumer protection cases, the latest probe further underscores regulators’ intensified scrutiny of Big Tech’s advertising power, a market worth hundreds of billions annually.