Yazılar

U.S. Court Denies TikTok’s Request to Delay Pending Ban

A U.S. appeals court on Friday rejected TikTok’s emergency motion to temporarily halt enforcement of a law requiring its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, to divest the app by January 19, leaving TikTok with limited options to prevent a potential shutdown in the United States.

TikTok and ByteDance had filed the motion earlier in the week with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, seeking more time to prepare their case for the Supreme Court. The companies argued that the law would effectively ban TikTok, a platform with over 170 million monthly users in the U.S., and significantly harm free speech.

The appeals court denied the request, noting that TikTok and ByteDance failed to cite precedent for a court enjoining a congressional act while awaiting Supreme Court review. “We find no case in which such action has been taken,” the court said in its unanimous order.

Following the ruling, TikTok announced plans to escalate the matter to the Supreme Court. A TikTok spokesperson emphasized the platform’s role as a critical speech platform and expressed confidence in the Court’s history of upholding free speech protections.

The law in question mandates that ByteDance divest its ownership of TikTok by January 19 or face a U.S. ban on the app. It also empowers the government to prohibit other foreign-owned apps deemed a national security risk due to data collection practices.

The U.S. Justice Department has defended the law, asserting that ByteDance’s control of TikTok poses “a continuing threat to national security.” TikTok disputes this claim, highlighting that U.S. user data and content moderation are managed domestically, with data stored on Oracle-operated cloud servers.

If the Supreme Court does not overturn the ruling, the app’s fate will hinge on decisions by President Joe Biden and his successor, President-elect Donald Trump. Biden must determine whether to grant a 90-day extension to the January 19 deadline, while Trump, who takes office the following day, has historically opposed a TikTok ban. However, Trump recently indicated he would not pursue the ban if elected.

On a related front, members of the U.S. House of Representatives committee on China have urged Alphabet (Google’s parent) and Apple to prepare to remove TikTok from their app stores if the law takes effect on January 19.

US Foreign Investment Panel Deadlocked Over Nippon-U.S. Steel Deal

The U.S. Treasury has informed Japan’s Nippon Steel that the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS) has yet to reach a consensus regarding its proposed $14.9 billion acquisition of U.S. Steel, according to a report by the Financial Times on Sunday.

The Treasury, which leads the CFIUS review process, reportedly sent a letter to both companies on Saturday, indicating that the nine-member panel remains divided on how to address security concerns raised by the deal. The committee is approaching a Dec. 22 deadline to decide whether to approve, block, or extend the review timeline for the acquisition.

CFIUS, which assesses foreign investments for potential national security risks, has expressed reservations about the deal. In September, the panel warned both Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel that the acquisition posed risks to the U.S. steel supply chain, particularly in sectors critical to transportation, construction, and agriculture.

The proposed acquisition has faced significant political pushback. Both President Joe Biden and his successor, Donald Trump, have signaled their opposition to the deal, further complicating its prospects.

While neither U.S. Steel nor CFIUS has commented on the Financial Times report, Nippon Steel declined to provide a statement. The deal’s future remains uncertain, as the CFIUS panel weighs the implications for national security amid ongoing scrutiny of foreign investments in critical industries.

BRICS’ Plan for Digital Assets Platform to Promote De-Dollarisation Draws Criticism from Trump

The BRICS nations are planning to launch a digital assets platform to facilitate cross-border settlements, a move that has sparked strong criticism from US President-elect Donald Trump. This new initiative aims to reduce the BRICS countries’ reliance on the US dollar, potentially reshaping global trade dynamics. The BRICS group, which originally included Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, has since expanded to include Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, and the UAE, further broadening its influence. This platform is seen as a step toward reducing the dominance of the US dollar in international transactions and fostering a more diversified global financial system.

Trump has strongly opposed this initiative, warning the BRICS nations, including India, of serious consequences if they continue to pursue de-dollarisation. Over the weekend, Trump issued a stern warning, suggesting that if the BRICS nations go ahead with their plans, they could face a dramatic 100 percent increase in tariff rates. The US President-elect’s comments reflect his firm stance on maintaining the dollar’s preeminent role in global trade and finance. He made it clear that any attempt to undermine the dollar’s dominance would not be tolerated by the United States.

In a tweet posted on December 1, Trump reiterated his position, stating that the days of the US “standing by” while the BRICS countries move away from the dollar are over. He emphasized that the BRICS nations must commit to not creating a new currency or backing any alternative currency that could challenge the US dollar’s global position. According to Trump, if the BRICS nations do not adhere to these demands, they could face punitive tariffs, which would effectively cut them off from the US market—a significant threat considering the size and importance of the American economy.

Trump’s comments underscore the growing tension between the US and the BRICS nations as they explore ways to reduce their dependence on the dollar. While the digital assets platform is still in the planning stages, it has already drawn attention from global leaders. The move is seen as part of a broader effort by BRICS to assert its economic independence and challenge the longstanding dominance of the US dollar in international trade. However, with Trump’s strong opposition, it remains to be seen how far BRICS will go in pursuing this ambitious financial shift.