Yazılar

Elon Musk’s X Now Valued 80% Less Than Purchase Price, According to Fidelity

The social media platform formerly known as Twitter, now X, has seen its value plunge nearly 80% since Elon Musk acquired it in October 2022. This staggering drop in valuation comes from estimates provided by Fidelity, a major investment firm that owns shares in X through its Blue Chip Growth Fund.

When Musk took Twitter private for $44 billion, it was a highly publicized acquisition. However, as of August 2024, Fidelity estimates that its shares in X are worth only $4.2 million, suggesting that the overall valuation of the company now stands at $9.4 billion—a far cry from the original purchase price. This represents a 24% drop from Fidelity’s own estimate in July and a 79% decline from its original valuation at the time of Musk’s purchase.

Declining Ad Revenue and Brand Safety Concerns

Fidelity’s assessment aligns with analysts’ concerns over X’s shrinking ad revenue, an issue compounded by the platform’s failure to publicly release financial metrics. Advertising has been a significant pain point for X since Musk’s acquisition, particularly with advertisers expressing discomfort over extreme content appearing on the platform. A Kantar global survey recently revealed that 26% of marketers plan to reduce ad spending on X in the coming year, with concerns over brand safety. Only 4% of advertisers believed their ads were safe from appearing near problematic content on X, compared to 39% on Google.

Musk’s public behavior has also contributed to advertiser unease. In November, he faced backlash after endorsing an antisemitic conspiracy theory. While he later apologized, he infamously told advertisers who were halting spending on X: “Go f**k yourself.”

Despite these setbacks, X remains a key player in social media with 570 million monthly active users in the second quarter of 2024, reflecting a 6% growth year-over-year. However, Similarweb data indicated declining engagement, particularly in the U.S., where X’s monthly active users on iOS and Android dropped 11% from the previous year and 20% since Musk’s acquisition.

Fidelity’s Estimate vs. Other Projections

While Fidelity’s valuation implies significant losses, not all experts agree with the extent of the decline. Gene Munster, managing partner at Deepwater Asset Management, argues that Fidelity is “overly aggressive” in its devaluation, believing the firm is simply cleaning house on its investment. Munster sees a longer-term potential in X’s vast data, particularly as a critical source of training material for Grok, an AI chatbot developed by xAI, Musk’s AI startup.

Dan Ives, an analyst at Wedbush Securities, suggested that Musk may have initially overpaid for Twitter, estimating its worth closer to $30 billion at the time of purchase and $15 billion today. However, Munster maintains optimism, noting that X’s value lies in the unique real-time data it provides, which is becoming increasingly valuable in the AI landscape. He added that Musk’s acquisition of Twitter might be a case of being “better lucky than smart,” given the rapid developments in AI.

How to Identify Medical Misinformation on Social Media, Especially for Gen Z Men

As access to online information increases, many Gen Z men are turning to social media for health advice. In fact, one-third of Gen Z men in the U.S. rely on social media as their go-to source for health information, according to a recent survey by the Cleveland Clinic.

The survey, which polled 1,000 American men aged 18 and older, revealed significant differences in how generations approach health concerns. While all generations consider healthcare providers as top sources of health information, Gen Z men are most likely to turn to social media for advice.

With so much information available online, it’s essential to identify and avoid medical misinformation. Here are four signs that may help you spot false health information, as recommended by Dr. Seema Yasmin, author of What The Fact?!: Finding the Truth in All the Noise, and Deen Freelon, professor at the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania:

  1. It sounds too good to be true: Be cautious of health claims that promise miracle cures or use words like “100% effective” or “guaranteed.” These terms are often associated with inaccurate or misleading information.
  2. It plays at your emotions: Posts designed to provoke emotional reactions are often intended to manipulate your feelings and make you share false information. Yasmin warns that misinformation is frequently structured to provoke a strong response, making it easier for falsehoods to spread.
  3. It promotes unfamiliar cures with no scientific backing: If a social media post advertises an alternative cure that you’ve never heard of, be skeptical. Freelon advises double-checking the source and verifying if the information is supported by reputable health organizations. Some individuals profit from promoting unverified health remedies.
  4. It feels fabricated or outlandish: When something seems too far-fetched or like science fiction, it may not be credible. If the information starts to unravel under basic questioning, it’s likely misinformation.

Both experts suggest always verifying the source of the health advice you come across. Ask yourself if the person sharing the information is truly qualified to speak on the subject or if they have a history of promoting dubious claims. Trustworthy health sources, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) or your state’s health organizations, are the best places to verify claims you’ve seen online.

Australia Proposes Minimum Age Requirement for Social Media Use, Sparking Controversy Among Youth Advocates

Australia boasts a highly connected digital landscape, with approximately 80% of its 26 million citizens actively engaging on social media platforms. Devamını Oku