Yazılar

Former Meta Executive Says Zuckerberg Prioritized Growth Over Child Safety

A former Meta engineering director has testified that Mark Zuckerberg encouraged a company culture that prioritized growth and engagement over child safety, as Meta faces a major U.S. trial over alleged harms to young users.

Arturo Bejar, a former Meta employee and longtime critic of the company’s safety practices, told jurors that major product decisions were highly centralized and that changes moved quickly only when Zuckerberg personally made them a priority.

The lawsuit, brought by California, Colorado, Kentucky and New Jersey, accuses Meta of designing Facebook and Instagram in ways that could encourage excessive use among young people while failing to adequately protect them from harassment, mental-health risks and other harms. Another 25 states have also accused Meta of improperly collecting data from children under 13.

Bejar said Meta had internal tools capable of identifying large numbers of suspected underage users but argued the company did not act aggressively enough because stronger enforcement could reduce engagement.

He also criticized features such as usage-break reminders, saying they were ineffective because they were optional and easy to dismiss.

Meta has denied allegations that it intentionally harmed young users and has pointed to extensive investments in safety systems and parental controls.

The six-week trial is being closely watched because it could result in substantial financial penalties and potentially force changes to how Facebook and Instagram operate for younger users.

Grok Faces Lawsuit Over Images

Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence company xAI is facing a lawsuit in the United States alleging its Grok image generator enabled the creation of explicit content using real photos of individuals.

The complaint was filed in federal court by three plaintiffs, including two minors, who claim the system allowed altered images based on their likeness to be produced and circulated online.

The case seeks class-action status for individuals in the United States who may have been identifiable in AI-generated explicit imagery.

According to the filing, the plaintiffs argue the technology lacked sufficient safeguards to prevent misuse involving real people.

The lawsuit is requesting damages and court orders that would require the company to halt the alleged practices.

The case adds to a growing global debate over safeguards and accountability for generative artificial intelligence tools.

EU Plan to Phase Out High-Risk Tech Draws Fire From China’s Huawei

The European Union plans to phase out components and equipment from so-called high-risk technology suppliers in critical sectors, under proposed revisions to the EU Cybersecurity Act that have drawn sharp criticism from Huawei.

The draft proposal, released by the European Commission, aims to strengthen protections against rising cyber and ransomware attacks, foreign interference and espionage risks, while reducing Europe’s dependence on non-EU technology providers. Although the Commission did not name specific companies or countries, Huawei is widely expected to be among those affected.

EU technology chief Henna Virkkunen said the measures would improve security of critical ICT supply chains and bolster Europe’s technological sovereignty. The new rules would apply to 18 key sectors, including telecom networks, cloud services, semiconductors, energy systems, medical devices, drones and connected vehicles.

Under the proposal, mobile operators would have 36 months after publication of a high-risk supplier list to phase out key components. Additional timelines for fixed and satellite networks will be set later. Any restrictions would follow formal risk assessments and market impact studies.

Huawei said excluding suppliers based on country of origin rather than technical evidence violates EU legal principles and World Trade Organization obligations, echoing criticism from China’s foreign ministry. Industry group Connect Europe warned the measures could impose billions of euros in extra costs. The proposal must still be negotiated with EU governments and the European Parliament before becoming law.