Yazılar

OpenAI Seeks Dismissal of xAI’s Trade-Secret Lawsuit, Calls It Part of Musk’s “Ongoing Harassment”

/in /tarafından

OpenAI has asked a U.S. federal judge to dismiss a lawsuit filed by Elon Musk’s startup xAI, which accuses the company of poaching employees to steal trade secrets. In a filing submitted Thursday, OpenAI described the case as part of Musk’s “ongoing harassment” campaign against the company he once co-founded.

The San Francisco lawsuit, filed by xAI last week, claims OpenAI engaged in a “deeply troubling pattern” of recruiting former xAI staff to gain access to proprietary information about its AI chatbot Grok, which it alleges is more advanced than ChatGPT.

OpenAI denied all allegations, calling them “false and unsubstantiated.” The company argued that employees are free to change jobs and that OpenAI has the right to hire talent from any competitor. “Under Musk’s leadership, talented xAI employees are leaving in droves, and some are coming to OpenAI to help advance OpenAI’s mission,” the filing stated. “Those employees have every right to go where they choose.”

OpenAI’s filing further accused Musk of using litigation as a distraction from xAI’s internal struggles, saying the startup is “hemorrhaging talent” to other firms. “This case is an attempt to intimidate OpenAI and distract from the failures of [Musk’s] own competitive AI effort,” the company argued.

Neither Musk’s representatives nor xAI’s attorneys immediately responded to requests for comment.

The dispute adds to a growing web of legal battles between Musk and OpenAI. Musk has already sued OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman over the company’s shift from a non-profit to a for-profit structure, while OpenAI has countersued Musk for harassment. Separately, xAI has sued Apple, alleging it conspired with OpenAI to suppress rival AI platforms—claims that both companies have denied and sought to have dismissed.

The escalating conflict underscores the intensifying rivalry within Silicon Valley’s AI race, where talent mobility, corporate secrecy, and massive investments have become flashpoints in the battle to dominate next-generation artificial intelligence.

Beijing E-Town Sues Applied Materials Over Alleged Trade Secret Theft

/in /tarafından

Beijing E-Town Semiconductor Technologies, a government-backed Chinese semiconductor equipment company, has filed a lawsuit against U.S. chip equipment supplier Applied Materials, accusing it of illegally obtaining and using trade secrets related to plasma sources and wafer surface treatment. The company seeks 99.99 million yuan ($13.94 million) in damages.

According to Beijing E-Town, Applied Materials disclosed technical secrets by applying for a patent in China and claiming the patent’s application rights. Applied Materials has not responded to requests for comment.

The dispute traces back to 2016 when Beijing E-Town acquired California-based semiconductor equipment designer Mattson Technology. Applied Materials previously sued Mattson in 2022, alleging it had hired former Applied Materials employees to steal trade secrets. Mattson countered with similar accusations in 2023.

In the new lawsuit filed at the Beijing Intellectual Property Court, Beijing E-Town claims that Applied Materials employed two former Mattson employees who later became principal inventors on a patent filed in China. This patent allegedly disclosed confidential technology jointly held by Beijing E-Town and Mattson. Beijing E-Town asserts that Applied Materials’ actions violated China’s fair competition law and constituted trade secret infringement.

The Beijing court has accepted the case, but no hearing has been scheduled yet.

Texas Company Sues Apple Over Alleged Theft of Technology Behind Apple Pay

/in /tarafından

Apple (AAPL.O) faces a lawsuit from Texas-based firm Fintiv, accusing the tech giant of stealing trade secrets and technology developed by CorFire, a company Fintiv acquired in 2014, to create Apple Pay. The complaint, filed in Atlanta federal court, alleges that Apple held multiple meetings and nondisclosure agreements with CorFire in 2011 and 2012 intending to license its mobile wallet technology but instead used the information and persuaded CorFire employees to join Apple.

Fintiv claims Apple used this technology to launch Apple Pay in 2014 and profited by generating fees for major credit card issuers and payment networks without compensating Fintiv. The lawsuit accuses Apple of corporate theft and racketeering under federal and Georgia trade secrets and RICO laws, seeking both compensatory and punitive damages.

Apple has not commented on the lawsuit. A related patent infringement case by Fintiv against Apple was dismissed earlier this month in Austin, Texas, with Fintiv planning to appeal.