Yazılar

OpenAI Weighs Antitrust Action Against Microsoft Amid Tensions Over AI Partnership

/in /tarafından

Executives at OpenAI have internally discussed whether to accuse Microsoft of anticompetitive behavior, potentially seeking a federal regulatory review of their contractual relationship, according to a report from the Wall Street Journal.

Microsoft, a major backer of OpenAI since 2019 with an investment exceeding $10 billion over time, has been a core infrastructure partner via its Azure cloud services. However, tensions between the companies appear to be growing as they negotiate the terms of OpenAI’s ongoing transition into a public-benefit corporation — a step that requires Microsoft’s approval.

Disputes and Strategic Divergences:

  • Talks between the two sides have dragged on for months without a final agreement on Microsoft’s future equity stake in OpenAI.

  • According to The Information, OpenAI is pushing for Microsoft to accept a 33% stake in a restructured subsidiary in exchange for giving up rights to future profits.

  • OpenAI also seeks to revise clauses that currently give Microsoft exclusive hosting rights for its models, potentially opening the door for other cloud providers like Google Cloud, which OpenAI has already begun engaging to expand its compute capacity.

Microsoft, reportedly unwilling to concede to OpenAI’s proposed restructuring, is said to be seeking further concessions. Still, both companies issued a joint statement to Reuters expressing optimism:

“Talks are ongoing and we are optimistic we will continue to build together for years to come.”

Possible Antitrust Implications:

Should OpenAI move forward with an antitrust complaint or regulatory appeal, it could dramatically reshape one of the most influential alliances in the artificial intelligence landscape. Microsoft’s deep integration with OpenAI — spanning cloud infrastructure, product embedding (like Copilot in Office), and funding — could come under increased regulatory scrutiny, especially in the U.S. and EU, where antitrust enforcement in tech has intensified.

This development highlights OpenAI’s increasing desire to diversify partnerships and assert strategic independence, even from its most powerful corporate backer.

Dutch Court Confirms Apple Abused Dominant Market Position in Dating App Case

/in /tarafından

A Dutch court has upheld a 2021 ruling by the Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM), confirming that Apple abused its dominant position in the dating app market through restrictive practices imposed via its App Store.

The Rotterdam District Court ruled that Apple was unfairly forcing dating app developers to use its in-app payment system, prohibiting references to alternative payment methods, and charging up to 30% commission (or **15% for smaller developers). These practices, according to the court, violated EU antitrust regulations.

In 2021, ACM had fined Apple €50 million ($58 million) for failing to comply with its order to change these app store policies. Monday’s court decision affirms that the regulator was justified in both its assessment and the penalties it imposed.

Apple announced it will appeal the ruling, defending its policies as protective of user privacy and security. “This ruling undermines the technology and tools we’ve created to benefit developers and protect users’ privacy and security, and we plan to appeal,” an Apple spokesperson said in a statement to Reuters.

The case highlights growing regulatory scrutiny of Apple’s App Store rules, which have come under fire in several jurisdictions for being anti-competitive. It also adds to the pressure from EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA), which is designed to open digital markets and limit the control of dominant platforms.

Meta’s $14.8 Billion Scale AI Deal Raises Regulatory Questions Amid AI Partnership Scrutiny

/in /tarafından

Meta’s $14.8 billion investment in data-labeling startup Scale AI, along with hiring its CEO, poses a test of the Trump administration’s stance on so-called “acquihire” deals—arrangements that some critics argue are used to bypass antitrust scrutiny.

The deal, announced Thursday, gives Meta a 49% nonvoting stake in Scale AI, which employs gig workers to manually label data and serves major clients including Meta’s rivals Microsoft and OpenAI. Because Meta does not gain a controlling stake, the transaction avoids mandatory U.S. antitrust review. Still, regulators could investigate if they suspect the deal was structured to sidestep rules or harm competition.

The structure aims to prevent Meta from cutting off competitors’ access to Scale’s services or gaining undue insight into rival operations. Despite this, Reuters reported that Alphabet’s Google has decided to sever ties with Scale following Meta’s investment, while other customers are reconsidering their relationships.

Scale AI stated its business remains strong and that it is committed to protecting customer data. Scale’s 28-year-old CEO Alexandr Wang will join Meta as part of the deal but will remain on Scale’s board with restricted access to sensitive information.

Experts say that while the Trump administration’s antitrust enforcers are cautious of big tech platforms, they generally want to avoid overregulating AI development. William Kovacic, competition law expert at George Washington University, noted regulators will watch these partnerships closely but might not intervene if they do not stifle competition.

Previous FTC inquiries into “acquihire” deals under the Biden administration—including Amazon’s hiring from AI startup Adept and Microsoft’s $650 million deal with Inflection AI—have so far resulted in no enforcement action.

Boston College Law professor David Olson highlighted Meta’s choice of a minority, nonvoting stake as a legal shield, though he acknowledged the FTC could still seek to review the deal.

The investment has drawn criticism from U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren, who called for scrutiny to ensure Meta does not unlawfully suppress competition or increase monopoly power. Meta is already facing an FTC monopoly lawsuit, but whether regulators will challenge this specific investment remains unclear.

Separately, the U.S. Department of Justice’s antitrust division is probing whether Google’s partnership with chatbot maker Character.AI was structured to evade regulatory review and is seeking advance notice of Google’s AI investments as part of broader efforts to rein in the company’s dominance.