OpenAI released its “Economic Blueprint” on Monday, emphasizing the need for the U.S. to attract investment and implement strategic regulations to retain its dominance in artificial intelligence (AI) as competition with China intensifies. The 15-page document outlined essential steps for the U.S. to secure its position, highlighting the importance of chips, data, and energy as critical components in the global AI race.
The release of this vision comes just ahead of President-elect Donald Trump taking office, whose administration is anticipated to be more supportive of the tech sector. David Sacks, a former PayPal executive, is expected to play a key role as the administration’s AI and crypto policy lead. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who donated approximately $1 million to Trump’s inaugural fund, joins other industry leaders in seeking to establish closer ties with the new administration.
Calls for Investment and Regulation
OpenAI warned that an estimated $175 billion in global funds is poised for investment in AI projects, stressing that the U.S. must act swiftly to attract these resources. “If the U.S. doesn’t secure these funds, they will flow to China-backed projects, strengthening the Chinese Communist Party’s global influence,” the blueprint stated.
The company also proposed export controls on advanced AI models to prevent their misuse by adversarial nations. This move aligns with growing concerns about how AI technologies could be weaponized or otherwise used to undermine global stability.
Washington Push and Funding Strategy
OpenAI plans to host an event in Washington, D.C., later this month to further discuss its recommendations and rally support for its initiatives. This advocacy comes as the Microsoft-backed startup aims to expand its funding base. OpenAI raised $6.6 billion last year and is looking to convert into a for-profit business model to sustain its growth in the increasingly competitive and costly AI sector.
As part of its vision, OpenAI urged the U.S. to establish a national framework for AI regulation, which would balance innovation with security concerns. Such a framework would also help cement the U.S.’s leadership in shaping global AI standards.
