The inauguration of U.S. President Donald Trump saw an unusual convergence of political power and wealth, as some of the world’s richest individuals gathered in Washington, D.C. to celebrate his swearing-in. The event bore similarities to the annual gathering of the global elite in Davos, Switzerland, as tech moguls and other billionaires attended Trump’s inauguration and the subsequent glamorous balls.
Key Points:
- Wealthy Attendees: The inauguration featured the world’s wealthiest individuals, including Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg, whose combined net worth is nearly $900 billion.
- Symbol of Influence: The attendance of these billionaires underscored the strong ties between the Trump administration and the wealthiest sectors of society. Critics see it as a sign that Trump’s policies could favor the elite through tax, labor, and trade decisions.
- Billionaire Influence on U.S. Politics: Some observers, like former President Biden, warned about the growing influence of an oligarchy in U.S. democracy. U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren noted the tech CEOs were seated prominently, suggesting favoritism.
- Musk’s Influence: Elon Musk, who contributed heavily to Trump’s re-election campaign, has been appointed to a panel aimed at reducing government spending. He is also expected to advocate for faster regulatory approval of self-driving vehicles.
- Tech CEO Involvement: Mark Zuckerberg of Meta, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, and Apple’s Tim Cook were also in attendance, with Zuckerberg hosting a pre-inaugural ball and engaging with Trump throughout the event.
- Other Billionaire Attendees: Other Forbes-listed billionaires, including Bernard Arnault (LVMH), Mukesh Ambani (India’s richest man), and Alphabet’s Sundar Pichai, also joined the inauguration festivities, showcasing the intersection of business interests and U.S. policy.
- TikTok Controversy: Trump’s engagement with TikTok and its CEO Shou Zi Chew, alongside discussions about the U.S. government potentially partially owning the app, highlighted the influence of the private sector on government decisions.
