U.S. Vice President JD Vance warned European leaders on Tuesday that heavy regulation on artificial intelligence (AI) could stifle the industry’s potential, arguing that “massive” regulations in Europe might “kill a transformative industry.” Speaking at the AI summit in Paris, Vance expressed opposition to the European Union’s strict regulatory approach, particularly criticizing the Digital Services Act and GDPR privacy rules, which he argued impose legal compliance costs on smaller firms.
Vance emphasized that AI must remain free from ideological bias and rejected the idea of AI being used as a tool for “authoritarian censorship.” In his speech, he argued that while ensuring safety online is important, it should not extend to restricting access to opinions deemed “misinformation” by governments. The U.S. delegation, led by Vance, did not sign the final statement of the summit, which endorsed principles of inclusive, ethical, and safe AI, diverging from the positions of Europe and other countries.
Vance also took the opportunity to address competition from China, warning about partnering with authoritarian regimes, which he said could pose a risk to nations’ information infrastructure. His comments seemed to reference the recent rise of Chinese startup DeepSeek, which challenged U.S. AI leadership with its freely distributed AI model.
While European leaders like French President Macron and European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen supported trimming regulatory red tape, they stressed that regulation is crucial for ensuring trust in AI. Macron called for “trustworthy AI,” while von der Leyen assured that the EU would reduce bureaucracy and invest more in AI development.
The U.S. and the UK did not explain why they did not sign the final statement, but the decision aligns with their focus on encouraging innovation over regulatory measures. Russell Wald, executive director at the Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, noted that the U.S. policy shift suggests a focus on accelerating innovation rather than safety-focused regulations.
