A U.S. federal judge has denied Elon Musk’s request to move a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) lawsuit from Washington, D.C. to Texas, rejecting his claim that the capital’s court location was overly burdensome given his packed schedule.
Judge Sparkle Sooknanan ruled on Thursday that while she acknowledges Musk’s demanding workload, his “considerable means” and frequent travel make Washington an appropriate venue. She also noted that Musk spends at least 40% of his time outside Texas, including significant periods in the capital, where he recently led the Department of Government Efficiency.
The judge emphasized that Texas courts face heavier caseloads, while her court could handle the matter with “reasonable alacrity.” Musk’s argument centered on his claim that he works 80 or more hours per week, often sleeping at his office or factories, and that defending himself in Washington would cause “substantial burdens.”
The SEC lawsuit, filed in January, accuses Musk of failing to timely disclose his acquisition of a 5% stake in Twitter (now X) in early 2022. The 11-day delay, according to the SEC, allowed him to buy over $500 million worth of shares at artificially low prices, saving him an estimated $150 million. The agency seeks a civil fine and the forfeiture of those gains, while Musk is attempting to have the case dismissed.
Musk, whose fortune reportedly surpassed $500 billion this week, resides in Austin, Texas, where his major companies—Tesla, SpaceX, and The Boring Company—are headquartered. He had also proposed moving the case to Manhattan, where former Twitter shareholders have filed a related lawsuit, but that request was likewise denied.
The case, titled SEC v. Musk, will proceed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia under docket number 25-00105, setting the stage for another high-profile courtroom battle involving one of the world’s most controversial billionaires.